Why need 3 people to play 3vs3?

Last post 07-05-2009, 4:07 AM by iHooT. 17 replies.
Page 1 of 2 (18 items)   1 2 Next >
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  07-04-2009, 10:37 PM 644685

    Why need 3 people to play 3vs3?

    This is a decent sugestion in my oppinion, how about you(Robot) competly turn off the party only matchmaking playlists. This would allow you to have a smaller set of playlist their by increasing the population in each. But you should still allow people to join playlist as party's like in halo 3 for example. This would also allow people (like me) who want to play 3vs3 but only have one other party member to be able to play a 3vs3 playlist with only two people and pick up another person as we go along.
  •  07-04-2009, 10:58 PM 644691 in reply to 644685

    Re: Why need 3 people to play 3vs3?

    Izaihaa:This is a decent sugestion in my oppinion, how about you(Robot) competly turn off the party only matchmaking playlists. This would allow you to have a smaller set of playlist their by increasing the population in each. But you should still allow people to join playlist as party's like in halo 3 for example. This would also allow people (like me) who want to play 3vs3 but only have one other party member to be able to play a 3vs3 playlist with only two people and pick up another person as we go along.

    Welcome to the Forums!

    But next time use the search bar.

    A lot of people want this, but the problem would be that people in a team would win a majority of the games.


    "Die?"Kurt laughed."Didn't you know?"he told the Elite. "...Spartans never die."
  •  07-04-2009, 11:25 PM 644703 in reply to 644691

    Re: Why need 3 people to play 3vs3?

    tmspartan:

    Izaihaa:This is a decent sugestion in my oppinion, how about you(Robot) competly turn off the party only matchmaking playlists. This would allow you to have a smaller set of playlist their by increasing the population in each. But you should still allow people to join playlist as party's like in halo 3 for example. This would also allow people (like me) who want to play 3vs3 but only have one other party member to be able to play a 3vs3 playlist with only two people and pick up another person as we go along.

    Welcome to the Forums!

    But next time use the search bar.

    A lot of people want this, but the problem would be that people in a team would win a majority of the games.

     

     

    In halo 3 they use the search for Teams of your size, so if you have one extra it finds a one extra. etc. 


    AveryHappyDrkness

    Have you had your dose of f*cked up today?
  •  07-05-2009, 12:35 AM 644753 in reply to 644703

    Re: Why need 3 people to play 3vs3?

    th3drkness:
    tmspartan:

    Izaihaa:This is a decent sugestion in my oppinion, how about you(Robot) competly turn off the party only matchmaking playlists. This would allow you to have a smaller set of playlist their by increasing the population in each. But you should still allow people to join playlist as party's like in halo 3 for example. This would also allow people (like me) who want to play 3vs3 but only have one other party member to be able to play a 3vs3 playlist with only two people and pick up another person as we go along.

    Welcome to the Forums!

    But next time use the search bar.

    A lot of people want this, but the problem would be that people in a team would win a majority of the games.

     

     

    In halo 3 they use the search for Teams of your size, so if you have one extra it finds a one extra. etc. 

    Halo 3 is much different then Halo Wars. It is much less cheap to have teams in halo 3 then in halo wars. Halo Wars takes more skill therefore having teams and non teams fight would be outrageous.


    Top 20 --- 2v2 Standard Party Teams, Matchmaking

    I'm the number one 2v2 Anders in the land thanks to Cheesypoof999!

    Turtle
    http://www.halowars.com/stats/StatsGame.aspx?Id=58768811-9889-7257-1870-000000000000
  •  07-05-2009, 1:45 AM 644788 in reply to 644685

    Re: Why need 3 people to play 3vs3?

    I've wondered the same thing myself for a while. There really is no need to have another person or two in order to play 2v2 or 3v3. The search feature should find you a teammate(s). I understand that the risk of doing this is that you may end up playing against a party of 3 that have played together for a long time and therefore will probably own you but even in defeat you can learn a lot so the game would still be fun. The party feature of this game needs to be removed and the veto option added. 

     

    Izaihaa:This is a decent sugestion in my oppinion, how about you(Robot) competly turn off the party only matchmaking playlists. This would allow you to have a smaller set of playlist their by increasing the population in each. But you should still allow people to join playlist as party's like in halo 3 for example. This would also allow people (like me) who want to play 3vs3 but only have one other party member to be able to play a 3vs3 playlist with only two people and pick up another person as we go along.


    Don't wound what you can't kill.
  •  07-05-2009, 1:51 AM 644794 in reply to 644788

    Re: Why need 3 people to play 3vs3?

    As I've posted in other threads, it already takes an entire night to possibly find one challenging match on 2v2/3v3 party if you're lucky, merging party with unarranged would kill the little competitiveness there is on 2v2/3v3.
    iEchoic
    #1 GB singles
    #1 solo matchmaking - 50 TS
    Winner of Army Leadership I, II, III & V

    iEchoic and DopedGoat
    #1 2v2 matchmaking (120-0)

    pT Rank One
    #1 GB team
    Winners of Gamebattles 3v3 March Mayhem Tournament
  •  07-05-2009, 2:34 AM 644825 in reply to 644794

    Re: Why need 3 people to play 3vs3?

    iEchoic:As I've posted in other threads, it already takes an entire night to possibly find one challenging match on 2v2/3v3 party if you're lucky, merging party with unarranged would kill the little competitiveness there is on 2v2/3v3.
    agreed.
    crusaderking:
    Tomanater is like a supply elevator. nuff said.
  •  07-05-2009, 2:37 AM 644826 in reply to 644825

    Re: Why need 3 people to play 3vs3?

    Tomanater00:
    iEchoic:As I've posted in other threads, it already takes an entire night to possibly find one challenging match on 2v2/3v3 party if you're lucky, merging party with unarranged would kill the little competitiveness there is on 2v2/3v3.
    agreed.

     

    this is just stupid.

    it would not kill competitiveness.

    It mite add a little more fun for the people who dont have 2 friends on.

    but lets be honest, the only 10 ppl who actually take this game serious play gamebattles and then post vids about it becuase of there huge egos. so why does matchmaking matter? 


    AveryHappyDrkness

    Have you had your dose of f*cked up today?
  •  07-05-2009, 2:41 AM 644827 in reply to 644826

    Re: Why need 3 people to play 3vs3?

    th3drkness:

    this is just stupid.

    it would not kill competitiveness.

    It mite add a little more fun for the people who dont have 2 friends on.

    but lets be honest, the only 10 ppl who actually take this game serious play gamebattles and then post vids about it becuase of there huge egos. so why does matchmaking matter? 

    Every one of your posts is a flame. Grow up/get a life, one of the two. 


    iEchoic
    #1 GB singles
    #1 solo matchmaking - 50 TS
    Winner of Army Leadership I, II, III & V

    iEchoic and DopedGoat
    #1 2v2 matchmaking (120-0)

    pT Rank One
    #1 GB team
    Winners of Gamebattles 3v3 March Mayhem Tournament
  •  07-05-2009, 2:42 AM 644828 in reply to 644827

    Re: Why need 3 people to play 3vs3?

    iEchoic:

    th3drkness:

    this is just stupid.

    it would not kill competitiveness.

    It mite add a little more fun for the people who dont have 2 friends on.

    but lets be honest, the only 10 ppl who actually take this game serious play gamebattles and then post vids about it becuase of there huge egos. so why does matchmaking matter? 

    Every one of your posts is a flame. Grow up/get a life, one of the two. 

     

    My bad is none of your GB buddies on to play with you?

    Is it my fault my posts dont consist of "in the 40+ this is what happens end of story" or... "watch this pointless vid of the 9 ppl who care enough to actually join such a pointless thing"

    dont cry to me becuase no1 takes you seriously 


    AveryHappyDrkness

    Have you had your dose of f*cked up today?
  •  07-05-2009, 2:44 AM 644829 in reply to 644828

    Re: Why need 3 people to play 3vs3?

    th3drkness: 

    My bad is none of your GB buddies on to play with you?

    Is it my fault my posts dont consist of "in the 40+ this is what happens end of story" or... "watch this pointless vid of the 9 ppl who care enough to actually join such a pointless thing"

    dont cry to me becuase no1 takes you seriously 

    Except I post vids to help the community and people say they enjoy them and ask me to post more. Certainly a lot better than a no-lifer who flames on the forums for fun. I grew out of that around 15, maybe you'll get there one day. 


    iEchoic
    #1 GB singles
    #1 solo matchmaking - 50 TS
    Winner of Army Leadership I, II, III & V

    iEchoic and DopedGoat
    #1 2v2 matchmaking (120-0)

    pT Rank One
    #1 GB team
    Winners of Gamebattles 3v3 March Mayhem Tournament
  •  07-05-2009, 2:45 AM 644831 in reply to 644829

    Re: Why need 3 people to play 3vs3?

    iEchoic:
    th3drkness: 

    My bad is none of your GB buddies on to play with you?

    Is it my fault my posts dont consist of "in the 40+ this is what happens end of story" or... "watch this pointless vid of the 9 ppl who care enough to actually join such a pointless thing"

    dont cry to me becuase no1 takes you seriously 

    Except I post vids to help the community and people say they enjoy them and ask me to post more. Certainly a lot better than a no-lifer who flames on the forums for fun. I grew out of that around 15, maybe you'll get there one day. 

     

    You dont help the community by posting every video that you "win" in.

    most of the time your videos get 10-15 responses half of them are people asking you to shut the f$ck up and stop posting this worthless stuff.

    the community doesnt need you, the community needs a few people making a stick on Build orders and basic strategies, not 3 ppl whining about guass and another 3 ppl ego boosting with a hall of fame post. 


    AveryHappyDrkness

    Have you had your dose of f*cked up today?
  •  07-05-2009, 2:47 AM 644834 in reply to 644831

    Re: Why need 3 people to play 3vs3?

    th3drkness:

    You dont help the community by posting every video that you "win" in.

    most of the time your videos get 10-15 responses half of them are people asking you to shut the f$ck up and stop posting this worthless stuff.

    Um, I've made one video thread. And I got overwhelmingly positive response, and I even had video of me losing. So basically everything you said was completely pulled out of your ass.

    You're sort of losing this argument horribly, I'd stop before you look more ridiculous than you already do.


    iEchoic
    #1 GB singles
    #1 solo matchmaking - 50 TS
    Winner of Army Leadership I, II, III & V

    iEchoic and DopedGoat
    #1 2v2 matchmaking (120-0)

    pT Rank One
    #1 GB team
    Winners of Gamebattles 3v3 March Mayhem Tournament
  •  07-05-2009, 2:50 AM 644836 in reply to 644831

    Re: Why need 3 people to play 3vs3?

    th3drkness:
    iEchoic:
    th3drkness: 

    My bad is none of your GB buddies on to play with you?

    Is it my fault my posts dont consist of "in the 40+ this is what happens end of story" or... "watch this pointless vid of the 9 ppl who care enough to actually join such a pointless thing"

    dont cry to me becuase no1 takes you seriously 

    Except I post vids to help the community and people say they enjoy them and ask me to post more. Certainly a lot better than a no-lifer who flames on the forums for fun. I grew out of that around 15, maybe you'll get there one day. 

     

    You dont help the community by posting every video that you "win" in.

    most of the time your videos get 10-15 responses half of them are people asking you to shut the f$ck up and stop posting this worthless stuff.

    the community doesnt need you, the community needs a few people making a stick on Build orders and basic strategies, not 3 ppl whining about guass and another 3 ppl ego boosting with a hall of fame post. 

    some people actually enjoy watching his and other peoples' high level videos. if you dont like them, dont watch them.


    AolxHangover:
    i've never spoken to crusader but whenever i see his forum posts i think of a forge with no mussels :P
  •  07-05-2009, 2:56 AM 644838 in reply to 644829

    Re: Why need 3 people to play 3vs3?

    iEchoic:
    th3drkness: 

    My bad is none of your GB buddies on to play with you?

    Is it my fault my posts dont consist of "in the 40+ this is what happens end of story" or... "watch this pointless vid of the 9 ppl who care enough to actually join such a pointless thing"

    dont cry to me becuase no1 takes you seriously 

    Except I post vids to help the community and people say they enjoy them and ask me to post more. Certainly a lot better than a no-lifer who flames on the forums for fun. I grew out of that around 15, maybe you'll get there one day. 

    where do you post vids? id like to see them.
    crusaderking:
    Tomanater is like a supply elevator. nuff said.
Page 1 of 2 (18 items)   1 2 Next >
View as RSS news feed in XML