why people keep resigning? even if you dont rush they resign when they see all your army, so ROBOT please for next update make a PENALTY for people that resign or destroy their bases cuz this is getting out of hand, i havent rank up cuz all the games that we won we just get like 40 point and 1500 max on 3v3.

 if they resign the winner gets extra 2000 bonus poinst and the guy who resign gets -(the total points of the winner, including bonus) then subtracted from their total gaming experience for HW. so these way people are going to be downgraded from their ranks and its going to make people stay till they are eliminated.

 

---

Gauss Cannon Research!.... OH YEA!
RUSH or GET RUSHED!
*Note: to call it rush, it has to be in less than 5 mn.

http://www.halowars.com/stats/StatsPlayer.aspx?id=3806188F36E17399AB826B394C3B9BA201BAF2B9A947F5814F8A46BE7481E408

What if the guy playing had a power outage, thus causing him to resign.

And you had collected the most points possible in a game.

His GS just got decimated.

Lol this is one of the stupidest complaints I've ever seen.  Sure in an FPS like Halo 3 quitting before the game is over is lame because you leave your teammates and stuff like that.  But in an RTS resigning is just part of the game.  It is what you do when you realize that you are going to lose.  It saves the other player the pain of destroying all your buildings.  So then why do people complain about it in Halo Wars?  Because they want their points and rank, neither of which means anything.  There really shouldn't be a penalty for resigning, however there already is (you get less points).  Just because you like to sit there and beat up on someone you've already beaten to rack up your score does not mean that person should have to stick around while you do so.

Clutch Cat4lyst:Lol this is one of the stupidest complaints I've ever seen.  Sure in an FPS like Halo 3 quitting before the game is over is lame because you leave your teammates and stuff like that.  But in an RTS resigning is just part of the game.  It is what you do when you realize that you are going to lose.  It saves the other player the pain of destroying all your buildings.  So then why do people complain about it in Halo Wars?  Because they want their points and rank, neither of which means anything.  There really shouldn't be a penalty for resigning, however there already is (you get less points).  Just because you like to sit there and beat up on someone you've already beaten to rack up your score does not mean that person should have to stick around while you do so.

That's why they gave you the ability to destroy your own buildings.

---

We Ride Dolphins- currently top 10 on Halo Wars GB 3v3. Look us up.

I know, if you've lost you should just destroy all your buildings so you don't lose your bonus points at the end.  But complaining that people do this is stupid.

LPeregrino:

 why people keep resigning? even if you dont rush they resign when they see all your army, so ROBOT please for next update make a PENALTY for people that resign or destroy their bases cuz this is getting out of hand, i havent rank up cuz all the games that we won we just get like 40 point and 1500 max on 3v3.

 if they resign the winner gets extra 2000 bonus poinst and the guy who resign gets -(the total points of the winner, including bonus) then subtracted from their total gaming experience for HW. so these way people are going to be downgraded from their ranks and its going to make people stay till they are eliminated.

 

Not a bad idea, but they should not lose points. You should just gain 1000 bonus points. IMO 2000 is going way over the limit. Well a great idea anyways, but who knows what will be in the upcomming DLC.

---

FLOOD = UNDER-RATED

The flood should be feared by all factions. In a way the covenant are OUR SAVIORS from the Flood.

you are all quitter i cant tell that, yea sure the destruction sound like an alternative to get point but what about the winner? only cuz you loose a match you think "well i lost i am not going to let my opponent get point for beating me" thats low man and you know that you have done this before or all the time when someone kick you a$$

---

Gauss Cannon Research!.... OH YEA!
RUSH or GET RUSHED!
*Note: to call it rush, it has to be in less than 5 mn.

http://www.halowars.com/stats/StatsPlayer.aspx?id=3806188F36E17399AB826B394C3B9BA201BAF2B9A947F5814F8A46BE7481E408

LPeregrino:you are all quitter i cant tell that, yea sure the destruction sound like an alternative to get point but what about the winner? only cuz you loose a match you think "well i lost i am not going to let my opponent get point for beating me" thats low man and you know that you have done this before or all the time when someone kick you a$$

That kind of attitude can be easily turned back against you. Observe.

 

you are winner i can tell that, yea sure you dont liek dat, but what about the loser? only cuz you win a match you think "well i won i am going to uber decimate my opponent i will take all teh points" thats low man and you know that you have doone this before or all the time whene you kick a$$

 

People that think that if they beat someone that person should have to sit there while they take their time killing them so they can keep points are so arrogant and frankly just jerks.  Giving you points when someone resigns is a terrible idea and completely unnecessary.  As I said before, points don't even mean anything so stop worrying so much about them.  Your trueskill makes you good, not the stupid rank symbol.  

they should just make it so that when you resign the winner will get the points that is on the map, even if the winner did not destroy it(ex. the main base and the 3 units gaurding the main base) so the winner would just get all of the points that are left on the map (plus the points the winner already won,duh)

No, there is nothing that needs to be changed about this.  Just because you want more points faster doesn't mean the game needs to be changed.

Clutch Cat4lyst:Lol this is one of the stupidest complaints I've ever seen.  Sure in an FPS like Halo 3 quitting before the game is over is lame because you leave your teammates and stuff like that.  But in an RTS resigning is just part of the game.  It is what you do when you realize that you are going to lose.  It saves the other player the pain of destroying all your buildings.  So then why do people complain about it in Halo Wars?  Because they want their points and rank, neither of which means anything.  There really shouldn't be a penalty for resigning, however there already is (you get less points).  Just because you like to sit there and beat up on someone you've already beaten to rack up your score does not mean that person should have to stick around while you do so.

 

Ffs.. im sick of dicks like you going "The points dont matter blah blah" sure maybe not to you! But the points and ranks are there for people who want to achieve and show what they have done and they shouldnt lose out on points for winning.. that just makes no sense..

it would be used for exp boosting. Take off the winner bonus

---

Let the be no greater heresy!!!

"If they came to here me beg, they will be disapointed."

"R U SURE?!"

I agree Clutch

 any ways id rather admit defeat rather than se my base blow up to opposing forces as i can do nothing to help it but you shouldnt care about points anyways

 

---

Looking for 1 3v3 team mate
if interested pm me
my gamertag is hexios and i play as arbiter

Also looking on how to effectivly use suicide grunts
in game plz help

mark360:they should just make it so that when you resign the winner will get the points that is on the map, even if the winner did not destroy it(ex. the main base and the 3 units gaurding the main base) so the winner would just get all of the points that are left on the map (plus the points the winner already won,duh)

I agree 100%. Once the losing player resigns, the winning player should get the points for whatever is worth on the map.

And the points do matter. They improve your rank, so many people care about them and not just TrueSkill.

Spartan-056:

LPeregrino:you are all quitter i cant tell that, yea sure the destruction sound like an alternative to get point but what about the winner? only cuz you loose a match you think "well i lost i am not going to let my opponent get point for beating me" thats low man and you know that you have done this before or all the time when someone kick you a$$

That kind of attitude can be easily turned back against you. Observe.

 

you are winner i can tell that, yea sure you dont liek dat, but what about the loser? only cuz you win a match you think "well i won i am going to uber decimate my opponent i will take all teh points" thats low man and you know that you have doone this before or all the time whene you kick a$$

 

Well, the loser should have played better. If he did, then he would be the one to "uber decimate" the opponent. The winner should get rewarded for beating the loser, even when the loser tries to undercut the winner's winnings.