The Halo-verse

Re: garrisonable vehicles

NightAngel — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:50:19 GMT

As far as ES were concerned This will never be implemented into halowars.

It was said way back before 08

Re: garrisonable vehicles

PHANTOM071494 — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:46:09 GMT

I love the idea. Idk about allies being able to put their units on my scarab. It might be kind of overpowered if a scarab had 5 spartans on it.

Re: garrisonable vehicles

dapperdanman — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:30:18 GMT

I mean the ones that are still working you know the ones that can like MOVE

Re: garrisonable vehicles

dw8000 — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 19:30:12 GMT

there are already garrisonable vehicles, the crashed and blown up warthogs like in the campaign mode and on certain maps =p

Re: garrisonable vehicles

Mr Sticky — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:35:57 GMT

I would have definately liked having the UNSC being able to build pelicans and the Covies spirits. Then you could upgrade them and stuff and they would be awesome.

Re: garrisonable vehicles

darstrska33 — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:17:56 GMT

yeah i have always felt that like the hog should come with a driver but u should have to garrison a infantry unite into it for turret and side seat. also u should of been able to build pelicans and garison unites into it like 10 infantry and likee 1 tank or 2 hogs. but with this would have to come a different set up for bases to build all these unites and that the populations would have to go way up and this would all have to spawn in a new game lol but i much rather have it this was so it couldd let way more stratagizing

Re: garrisonable vehicles

dw8000 — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:25:54 GMT

I think it should be 2 (units drop out when vehicle blows up), just like spartans jump out when banshees or wraiths or whatever they are in. Then again Spartans have armor and what not. :)

Re: garrisonable vehicles

u aint tuffenuf — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 04:42:10 GMT

yeah i agree. if youve ever played tom clancys endwar it would make sense. they had a great way like the transports/ apcs were good against air units.

Re: garrisonable vehicles

Groovinator57 — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:25:14 GMT

For the covy have wraiths with one squad and scarab with three. For the Unsc have one squad on a tank and allow three squads into a vulture so they can jump down to the surface.

Re: garrisonable vehicles

Korther — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:33:08 GMT

SPC COMMANDO:
flip yap:How would you do that? I mean, what button would you use to do this? The 'y' button for infantry is their special, grenades. Not that it's a bad idea ,but, which button wuld you use?
press X over the vehicle, it would be like putting them in a downed pelican.

Too bad the Covenant has nothing for their infantry to hop on. The only thing the UNSC has is Scorpions, the Hornets get an upgrade. Where would they fit on a Vulture? Inside? Cobra's have little or no room for it, same with Wolverines. Nothing can fit on a Vampire or Banshee, along with Wraith's or Ghosts. So....

Re: garrisonable vehicles

g gnome2012 — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 23:14:27 GMT

i agree with this idea but i have already mentioned that they should have added the troop tansport hog and no-one seemed to agree

Re: garrisonable vehicles

dapperdanman — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 23:00:48 GMT

sp4rt4n:great idea in a way cuz the grizzly can hold a squad of marines while the scarab could hold like 5 or more kind of lopsided

not really because you can easily have 5 tanks to one scarab so with five tanks and one squad a each adds up to five infantry

Re: garrisonable vehicles

sp4rt4n — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:29:39 GMT

great idea in a way cuz the grizzly can hold a squad of marines while the scarab could hold like 5 or more kind of lopsided

Re: garrisonable vehicles

Minime — Sat, 30 May 2009 22:22:19 GMT

Another good idea is to use something like the pelican ability. It would be called the convoy which 3 troop hogs would appear and transport any infantry that are in the blue circles area. It could carry up to 6 infantry units. But it would be cheaper than the pelican and a little bit slower due to its non-ability to climb over mountians or fly over them. There would be a 10 second recharge rate. Or this could be called the reinforcement ability and instead of transport units you would have to build it would instead carry a team of 4 marine squads and 2 flamers. It would then have a 30 second recharge rate and would be a little bit higher in price.

Re: garrisonable vehicles

comrade chube — Sat, 30 May 2009 20:06:00 GMT

this is exallant also wouldent it make sense if the anti-infantry/anti-garrison units to compleatly remove the infantry from the vehicle but they hardly do any damage to the vehicle. hope it makes sense