Re: C&C vs Halo Wars

  •  10-07-2009, 3:04 PM

    Re: C&C vs Halo Wars

    Vert:

    Seriously, C&C sucked, bad controls, inferior graphics and i didn't like it at all. Mostly cause the controls sucked, Halo Wars punched it in the balls with moderate graphics a kick ass control system and awesome plot and game them, Halo.

    Considering that C&C died within a couple of months like from 10k to 300 and halo wars has kept at the 15k 20 k range (at any one given time) I think we got it pretty good. Anyone else got anything to add?

     

     

    Did u just say C&C had bad graphics....... hell no. great graphics, great units and upgrades etc etc. Controls are bad though.

     

    Halo Wars are is a very dumbed down RTS vs C&C. it is highly based on very very fast action. purely action. very low strategy.

     

    well lets go through pros and cons

     

    Command and Conquer 3

    pros:

    Great graphics

    great gameplay

    great units

    great upgrades(noticeing a trend here...hmmm.)

    great campaign(give or take)

    cons:

    yes it did die fast on console

    bad controls

    learning curve

    etc

     

    Halo Wars

    pros:

    fast fun. 8 year old can play it and we all know they do.

    basic.

    HALO...probably one of the only reason so many people still play it.

    cons:

    fairly bad graphics

    sketchy campaign

    to easy that hardcore RTSers are bored.

    etc etc

     

    just thoughts.

     


    YEAH! TU4 lookin good!

View Complete Thread