I don't know about some people, but when halo 2 came out I played it hardcore, but I would have to saw Gears of War is better than halo 2 and halo. It has more depth to the game, even if it is a little on the arcade side. The use of coverage and the pinch of arcade makes it seem more than just a point in click. If you look at Halo 2 online. You really do not do much than point in click. Yes you do that with Gears of War, but they add more to it. You can not just dive out and rush into the fray like halo 2, becuase in GoW you would get raped by any normal player. Even the hardcore players would have trouble against a semi-smart person to cross the distance to reach them. Halo i've seen pretty much the opposite people walking out in the middle of the open with a sniper taking out everyone and everywere. You can not do that in GoW it requires more brain power so to speak. Dont get me wrong I still play halo 2 a lot, but not as much as GoW. Halo 2 is more of a speed fps and GoW is more saucy >.> Eh, there 2 cents in a nutshell. Try not to crack down on this for you halo 2 lovers without taking into consideration of the details I can add to this and more examplse, but my point i'm trying to make is there. Just read it...carefully >.> If you can not understand it. People love games like halo 2 and CS-Source for the speed and the rush, you really don't do more than point and click. Unless you get in a vechile than you run them over or point and click >.> When one man can take out 4 people. It says a lot, but even the rank number one in GoW probably couldn't take out your above average players in a 4v1. Halo its a realistic possibility.
How many people does it take to tell a person to not judge a game?