Encrypted AI:

crusaderking:getting a 95% win average in party isn't that hard, since 19 out of 20 times suck.

Heck me, stud and Identical have a 90%, and all we do is stupid stuff (triple elephant rush FTW), and identical does not know how to play high level (ok, not amazing) so we lose 5% because of one of the first two, and then the other 5% is that stud lags out and then Idencial rage quits, and then its 1 vs 3, I still win about 80% of the 1 vs 3's

Me and Agro have 95%+ wins playing seriously(only losing to Nate/bb). but we have only played 20 games.

Sometimes you can get 50 wins in a row, while sometimes you face harder teams, but having 98%+ is hall of fame material for 3v3, and maybe 2v2 imo.

Yep, plus Agro did build locusts vs bb/Nate so I'm not even sure he was trying lol.

 

---

Forge FTW.
3 accounts in the top 50 1v1 standard.
Good 1v1 standard non-asian Forge player
45 TS For 1v1

URL of the week:
http://wwp.greenwichmeantime.com/time-zone/usa/pacific-time/

how bout you try winning 2 of 3 from almost anybody on the forums...

---

StrengthOfSteel.

SaYHi2BoOyAh:

what a nice guy

crusaderking:

Encrypted AI:

crusaderking:getting a 95% win average in party isn't that hard, since 19 out of 20 times suck.

Heck me, stud and Identical have a 90%, and all we do is stupid stuff (triple elephant rush FTW), and identical does not know how to play high level (ok, not amazing) so we lose 5% because of one of the first two, and then the other 5% is that stud lags out and then Idencial rage quits, and then its 1 vs 3, I still win about 80% of the 1 vs 3's

Me and Agro have 95%+ wins playing seriously(only losing to Nate/bb). but we have only played 20 games.

Sometimes you can get 50 wins in a row, while sometimes you face harder teams, but having 98%+ is hall of fame material for 3v3, and maybe 2v2 imo.

Yep, plus Agro did build locusts vs bb/Nate so I'm not even sure he was trying lol.

 

I'm not sure on mine and Soupy's, but we lose a lot more when he's not Cutter.

Whenever we decide switch it up and do a different combo, we run into more losses. And even then they're few and far between.

---

GT: Restricted NAT23

Controllers gone though since March 3rd, 2009: 739

gilberg23:

crusaderking:

Encrypted AI:

crusaderking:getting a 95% win average in party isn't that hard, since 19 out of 20 times suck.

Heck me, stud and Identical have a 90%, and all we do is stupid stuff (triple elephant rush FTW), and identical does not know how to play high level (ok, not amazing) so we lose 5% because of one of the first two, and then the other 5% is that stud lags out and then Idencial rage quits, and then its 1 vs 3, I still win about 80% of the 1 vs 3's

Me and Agro have 95%+ wins playing seriously(only losing to Nate/bb). but we have only played 20 games.

Sometimes you can get 50 wins in a row, while sometimes you face harder teams, but having 98%+ is hall of fame material for 3v3, and maybe 2v2 imo.

Yep, plus Agro did build locusts vs bb/Nate so I'm not even sure he was trying lol.

 

I'm not sure on mine and Soupy's, but we lose a lot more when he's not Cutter.

Whenever we decide switch it up and do a different combo, we run into more losses.

When I go randam all with agro, we lose too much, we got double cutter way too much for it to be random lol.

---

Forge FTW.
3 accounts in the top 50 1v1 standard.
Good 1v1 standard non-asian Forge player
45 TS For 1v1

URL of the week:
http://wwp.greenwichmeantime.com/time-zone/usa/pacific-time/

crusaderking:

gilberg23:

crusaderking:

Encrypted AI:

crusaderking:getting a 95% win average in party isn't that hard, since 19 out of 20 times suck.

Heck me, stud and Identical have a 90%, and all we do is stupid stuff (triple elephant rush FTW), and identical does not know how to play high level (ok, not amazing) so we lose 5% because of one of the first two, and then the other 5% is that stud lags out and then Idencial rage quits, and then its 1 vs 3, I still win about 80% of the 1 vs 3's

Me and Agro have 95%+ wins playing seriously(only losing to Nate/bb). but we have only played 20 games.

Sometimes you can get 50 wins in a row, while sometimes you face harder teams, but having 98%+ is hall of fame material for 3v3, and maybe 2v2 imo.

Yep, plus Agro did build locusts vs bb/Nate so I'm not even sure he was trying lol.

 

I'm not sure on mine and Soupy's, but we lose a lot more when he's not Cutter.

Whenever we decide switch it up and do a different combo, we run into more losses.

When I go randam all with agro, we lose too much, we got double cutter way too much for it to be random lol.

I don't play with Agro anymore.

80%+/- of my losses in 2v2 are with Agro

---

GT: Restricted NAT23

Controllers gone though since March 3rd, 2009: 739

m3 Patriot:

Now that Halo Wars is coming to it's end, I have come with a list of 3 players to be inducted to the Halo Wars HALL OF FAME.

 

1. IHavvk- 748-31 3v3 party - 192-20 2v2 party

        TS AVG- 40

 

2. Hannibalsun13- 805-32 3v3 party - 359-23 2v2 party

        TS AVG- 40+ all playlists

 

3. m3 Patriot- 992-55 3v3 party- 404-28 2v2 party

         TS AVG 40+ 4 playlists  "everyones favorite anders player."

 

these great 3 warriors are forever remembered for doing it the honest way no cheating just great tacticians of the game.

 (stats don't lie)

 

 

 

Way to make a 110% biased thread to boost your E-peen, get a life, no one cares about you or your records.

gilberg23:

crusaderking:

gilberg23:

crusaderking:

Encrypted AI:

crusaderking:getting a 95% win average in party isn't that hard, since 19 out of 20 times suck.

Heck me, stud and Identical have a 90%, and all we do is stupid stuff (triple elephant rush FTW), and identical does not know how to play high level (ok, not amazing) so we lose 5% because of one of the first two, and then the other 5% is that stud lags out and then Idencial rage quits, and then its 1 vs 3, I still win about 80% of the 1 vs 3's

Me and Agro have 95%+ wins playing seriously(only losing to Nate/bb). but we have only played 20 games.

Sometimes you can get 50 wins in a row, while sometimes you face harder teams, but having 98%+ is hall of fame material for 3v3, and maybe 2v2 imo.

Yep, plus Agro did build locusts vs bb/Nate so I'm not even sure he was trying lol.

 

I'm not sure on mine and Soupy's, but we lose a lot more when he's not Cutter.

Whenever we decide switch it up and do a different combo, we run into more losses.

When I go randam all with agro, we lose too much, we got double cutter way too much for it to be random lol.

I don't play with Agro anymore.

80%+/- of my losses in 2v2 are with Agro

lol, did he build things like locusts vs tanks and banshees?

---

Forge FTW.
3 accounts in the top 50 1v1 standard.
Good 1v1 standard non-asian Forge player
45 TS For 1v1

URL of the week:
http://wwp.greenwichmeantime.com/time-zone/usa/pacific-time/

crusaderking:

gilberg23:

crusaderking:

gilberg23:

crusaderking:

Encrypted AI:

crusaderking:getting a 95% win average in party isn't that hard, since 19 out of 20 times suck.

Heck me, stud and Identical have a 90%, and all we do is stupid stuff (triple elephant rush FTW), and identical does not know how to play high level (ok, not amazing) so we lose 5% because of one of the first two, and then the other 5% is that stud lags out and then Idencial rage quits, and then its 1 vs 3, I still win about 80% of the 1 vs 3's

Me and Agro have 95%+ wins playing seriously(only losing to Nate/bb). but we have only played 20 games.

Sometimes you can get 50 wins in a row, while sometimes you face harder teams, but having 98%+ is hall of fame material for 3v3, and maybe 2v2 imo.

Yep, plus Agro did build locusts vs bb/Nate so I'm not even sure he was trying lol.

 

I'm not sure on mine and Soupy's, but we lose a lot more when he's not Cutter.

Whenever we decide switch it up and do a different combo, we run into more losses.

When I go randam all with agro, we lose too much, we got double cutter way too much for it to be random lol.

Something like that.

He would ALWAYS keep his base locked. (bolded, Italicized, and underlined for emphasis)

When me and Soupy play we lose maybe 1 game out of 50+.

Me and Shurikan have lost twice. Once to Bas1sta and Death Toaster, adn the other were people I can't remember.

But me and Shurikan played them again and won. :]

I don't play with Agro anymore.

80%+/- of my losses in 2v2 are with Agro

lol, did he build things like locusts vs tanks and banshees?

How did this happen?

ha

---

GT: Restricted NAT23

Controllers gone though since March 3rd, 2009: 739

gilberg23:

crusaderking:

gilberg23:

crusaderking:

gilberg23:

crusaderking:

Encrypted AI:

crusaderking:getting a 95% win average in party isn't that hard, since 19 out of 20 times suck.

Heck me, stud and Identical have a 90%, and all we do is stupid stuff (triple elephant rush FTW), and identical does not know how to play high level (ok, not amazing) so we lose 5% because of one of the first two, and then the other 5% is that stud lags out and then Idencial rage quits, and then its 1 vs 3, I still win about 80% of the 1 vs 3's

Me and Agro have 95%+ wins playing seriously(only losing to Nate/bb). but we have only played 20 games.

Sometimes you can get 50 wins in a row, while sometimes you face harder teams, but having 98%+ is hall of fame material for 3v3, and maybe 2v2 imo.

Yep, plus Agro did build locusts vs bb/Nate so I'm not even sure he was trying lol.

 

I'm not sure on mine and Soupy's, but we lose a lot more when he's not Cutter.

Whenever we decide switch it up and do a different combo, we run into more losses.

When I go randam all with agro, we lose too much, we got double cutter way too much for it to be random lol.

Something like that.

He would ALWAYS keep his base locked. (bolded, Italicized, and underlined for emphasis)

When me and Soupy play we lose maybe 1 game out of 50+.

Me and Shurikan have lost twice. Once to Bas1sta and Death Toaster, adn the other were people I can't remember.

But me and Shurikan played them again and won. :]

I don't play with Agro anymore.

80%+/- of my losses in 2v2 are with Agro

lol, did he build things like locusts vs tanks and banshees?

He would ALWAYS keep his base locked. (bolded, Italicized, and underlined for emphasis)

When me and Soupy play we lose maybe 1 game out of 50+.

Me and Shurikan have lost twice. Once to Bas1sta and Death Toaster, adn the other were people I can't remember.

But me and Shurikan played them again and won. :]

---

GT: Restricted NAT23

Controllers gone though since March 3rd, 2009: 739

gilberg23:

gilberg23:

crusaderking:

gilberg23:

crusaderking:

gilberg23:

crusaderking:

Encrypted AI:

crusaderking:getting a 95% win average in party isn't that hard, since 19 out of 20 times suck.

Heck me, stud and Identical have a 90%, and all we do is stupid stuff (triple elephant rush FTW), and identical does not know how to play high level (ok, not amazing) so we lose 5% because of one of the first two, and then the other 5% is that stud lags out and then Idencial rage quits, and then its 1 vs 3, I still win about 80% of the 1 vs 3's

Me and Agro have 95%+ wins playing seriously(only losing to Nate/bb). but we have only played 20 games.

Sometimes you can get 50 wins in a row, while sometimes you face harder teams, but having 98%+ is hall of fame material for 3v3, and maybe 2v2 imo.

Yep, plus Agro did build locusts vs bb/Nate so I'm not even sure he was trying lol.

 

I'm not sure on mine and Soupy's, but we lose a lot more when he's not Cutter.

Whenever we decide switch it up and do a different combo, we run into more losses.

When I go randam all with agro, we lose too much, we got double cutter way too much for it to be random lol.

Something like that.

He would ALWAYS keep his base locked. (bolded, Italicized, and underlined for emphasis)

When me and Soupy play we lose maybe 1 game out of 50+.

Me and Shurikan have lost twice. Once to Bas1sta and Death Toaster, adn the other were people I can't remember.

But me and Shurikan played them again and won. :]

I don't play with Agro anymore.

80%+/- of my losses in 2v2 are with Agro

lol, did he build things like locusts vs tanks and banshees?

He would ALWAYS keep his base locked. (bolded, Italicized, and underlined for emphasis)

When me and Soupy play we lose maybe 1 game out of 50+.

Me and Shurikan have lost twice. Once to Bas1sta and Death Toaster, adn the other were people I can't remember.

But me and Shurikan played them again and won. :]

Good job beating Bas1sta, that is sPro Mitch. Death Toaster is sPro DeathToast so I wouldn't call it an accomplishment for beating him, though...

Here I'll give you the links:

Game 1:

 http://www.halowars.com/stats/StatsGame.aspx?Id=13910909-3138-8768-9851-000000000000

Cutter on Labyrinth=loss againse anyone good.

Game 2:

http://www.halowars.com/stats/StatsGame.aspx?Id=63119800-0463-7615-3590-000000000000

Wolves vs. Air is always win.

---

GT: Restricted NAT23

Controllers gone though since March 3rd, 2009: 739

Well, I don't understand why you would build locusts vs tanks and banshees.

It was against nate/bb too, maybe he thoought it was hopeless?

---

Forge FTW.
3 accounts in the top 50 1v1 standard.
Good 1v1 standard non-asian Forge player
45 TS For 1v1

URL of the week:
http://wwp.greenwichmeantime.com/time-zone/usa/pacific-time/

crusaderking:

Well, I don't understand why you would build locusts vs tanks and banshees.

It was against nate/bb too, maybe he thoought it was hopeless?

He was probably going for their bases.

...But missed?

---

GT: Restricted NAT23

Controllers gone though since March 3rd, 2009: 739

gilberg23:

crusaderking:

Well, I don't understand why you would build locusts vs tanks and banshees.

It was against nate/bb too, maybe he thoought it was hopeless?

He was probably going for their bases.

...But missed?

they had an arby though.

---

Forge FTW.
3 accounts in the top 50 1v1 standard.
Good 1v1 standard non-asian Forge player
45 TS For 1v1

URL of the week:
http://wwp.greenwichmeantime.com/time-zone/usa/pacific-time/

gilberg23:

crusaderking:

Well, I don't understand why you would build locusts vs tanks and banshees.

It was against nate/bb too, maybe he thoought it was hopeless?

He was probably going for their bases.

...But missed?

ahm nice sig ^^

---

Sl Loboz:

then ethics came, and all was good in the world