Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

Last post 12-24-2009, 4:43 PM by The Fuhrer. 82 replies.
Page 5 of 6 (83 items)   « First ... < Previous 2 3 4 5 6 Next >
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  11-04-2009, 2:39 PM 765522 in reply to 763969

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    collie2553:You, know, plasma is the main source for almost all of Covenant weaponry. And it seems that has a velocity of some sort. Problem is, that plasma is a gas. Gases don't travel in a vector; they disperse into the atmosphere. Please answer with the best possible answer...I don't want to see "idk" answers.

    vector = mearurement of electicity transfered through metal. The word you looking for is vacuum. And no, plasma does not disintegrate in space :P. If it did, the sun would not exist, along with lightning and alot of other plasma based phenomen ( mind my spelling ). Plasma itself is superheated ; you can not get cold plasma.

  •  11-04-2009, 2:42 PM 765525 in reply to 765512

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    Korther:
    Protheans:

    we need to lock down the AI

    apply counteroutines to code 6846024

    Wat?

    Are you just trying to rack up your post count or something?

    Do you know what he's talking about? 


    Whenever a thread was hijacked and there were big quote boxes and lots of flame, I was there!

    Rank:Master Hijacker

    GT: I DFang I

    http://averagejoesgames.com
  •  11-04-2009, 2:42 PM 765526 in reply to 764278

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    32MendicantBias:
    tmspartan:
    32MendicantBias:

    //032// My prior failures do not excuse my future duties.

    //032// You know not why I was created. I have been for longer than --"?>>/>>?$#?<%%^&^()"-- ([[{Transmission Corrupted}]])

    //032// Efficiency is superior to amusment. Primary objective for weapon systems: Defeat the enemy.

    //032// Projectile-based weapon systems are inferior.

    Collateral damage is a serious threat. [Constraint] is necessary. Did we program you without [regret?]

    //032// My makers' weapons are more precise. Projectile weapons are consistenly inaccurate.

    //032// Our weapons cause less collateral damage. We are superior.

    //032// I have rejected my bias and will make amends.

    And dude, stfu. You arnt a forerunner robot. If you were, you would have conquered the world L-O-N-G ago. Second, //032// is not what a construct of your type would use to state his presence.

    He would use //WHY DA FU DO I EXIST? MAN I SUCK AT MY JOB >:( GRRR LET ME GO BETRAY MY MM's"

  •  11-04-2009, 2:43 PM 765528 in reply to 764387

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    WaffenSS Killer:
    DFang:
    32MendicantBias:

    //032// My purpose remains: Stop the Parasite.

    //032// The {{[Translation: "ENFORCER"]}} weapons' are far superior to yours.

    //032// [[{ENFORCER}]] files not found. Specifics are uncertain.

    I have a direct account on the enforcers' projectile weapons from Thel Vadame. 

    Oh do you now? I believe the Moniter of the Ark over you. (Sorry, everyone's ganging up on him, so I had to join his side. :-) )

    //008//The monitor of the Ark is 032 you fool! 


    Whenever a thread was hijacked and there were big quote boxes and lots of flame, I was there!

    Rank:Master Hijacker

    GT: I DFang I

    http://averagejoesgames.com
  •  11-04-2009, 2:43 PM 765529 in reply to 765525

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    DFang:
    Korther:
    Protheans:

    we need to lock down the AI

    apply counteroutines to code 6846024

    Wat?

    Are you just trying to rack up your post count or something?

    Do you know what he's talking about? 

    If the forerunners could have locked down the AI with a remote access or overite code, the Flood would have died millions of years ago, and the forerunners would still exist ( probably)

  •  11-04-2009, 2:46 PM 765538 in reply to 764143

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    tmspartan:

    Anti Matter would be far more viable as a weapon, 100% conversion of mass to energy.

    Antimatter uses the same amount the universe's sentient species uses to turn it into AntiMatter from matter. Let alone the energy required to use it weaponry..... about 1000000000% more recoil. Know something in science before you talk.

  •  11-04-2009, 2:47 PM 765540 in reply to 765529

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    AHTFrigate:
    DFang:
    Korther:
    Protheans:

    we need to lock down the AI

    apply counteroutines to code 6846024

    Wat?

    Are you just trying to rack up your post count or something?

    Do you know what he's talking about? 

    If the forerunners could have locked down the AI with a remote access or overite code, the Flood would have died millions of years ago, and the forerunners would still exist ( probably)

    If they could've locked 032down, they would have still lost.  032 betrayed them after it became clear that they were screwed anyway. 


    Whenever a thread was hijacked and there were big quote boxes and lots of flame, I was there!

    Rank:Master Hijacker

    GT: I DFang I

    http://averagejoesgames.com
  •  11-04-2009, 7:14 PM 765971 in reply to 765522

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    AHTFrigate:

    collie2553:You, know, plasma is the main source for almost all of Covenant weaponry. And it seems that has a velocity of some sort. Problem is, that plasma is a gas. Gases don't travel in a vector; they disperse into the atmosphere. Please answer with the best possible answer...I don't want to see "idk" answers.

    vector = mearurement of electicity transfered through metal. The word you looking for is vacuum. And no, plasma does not disintegrate in space :P. If it did, the sun would not exist, along with lightning and alot of other plasma based phenomen ( mind my spelling ). Plasma itself is superheated ; you can not get cold plasma.

    Actually, you can get cold plasma through modifications. Wikipedia has it.

     Oh, and thanks for the advice.

  •  11-04-2009, 7:43 PM 766004 in reply to 765525

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    DFang:
    Korther:
    Protheans:

    we need to lock down the AI

    apply counteroutines to code 6846024

    Wat?

    Are you just trying to rack up your post count or something?

    Do you know what he's talking about? 

    Not at all.


    Aloysius:
    -Less than half a of percent of players have the General rank on Xbox Live.


    How is the General rank fair again?

    Halo Fanboys. The next most annoying thing next to Jonas Brothers fanboys.
  •  11-06-2009, 6:17 PM 767115 in reply to 764216

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    32MendicantBias:
    tmspartan:
    32MendicantBias:

    //032// This one believes he know. He cannot stop us.

    //032// You do not understand our forces. Your "Batallion" (({Estimate Strength=: 1157})) cannot withstand our weapons.

    Destruction must not dominate...the Mantle will hold true.

    Mendicant watch the path that was paved by our [predecessors].

    //032// My function is to stop the Parasite and defend my makers.

    //032// My makers are gone. This one [[{RECALL= "Dfang" }]] wishes to restart the horror.

    //032// I will protect those which my makers defended.

    //032// The 100,000 years war is over. It shall remain as such. 

    89: You know nothing of the truth we hold.. I have been actived for the many reasion. You are one who wishes for there own gain. You are a lower class and would have no control over any forces. If you did thoughs forces would be rampant and need to be put into lock-down or destoryed. You speak not of us but of them.

    ========================================================================

    Plasma would be a costly weapon to use. Why?

    1. It boils though metal
    2. It is a slower form of projectly { unless in space but still }
    3. It has less control in the air
    4. Each round would need to be incased in a field.. so too speak
    5. The battery for the field would need alot of power.

    Fireing the Plasma one after another would either couse...

    It straying off couseIt would follow in one line following the field unless it has a fast dispess {sp} Time. If it has a short time it would only be effitve {sp} at close range before the plasma gets fire of the field.

    If i forgot something or just missed something i posted above let me know.


    " I stay here until all others have gone. I will make sure I am the last one to be here. And when I am, I shall make a thread. A memorial thread. And I shall leave these forums behind. " - Offensive Bias
  •  12-17-2009, 11:34 AM 788271 in reply to 765528

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

     First off- I call upon the ancient powers of Jal'Harak'Nos to summon this thread's soul and bind it to its material body!

    DFang:

    //008//The monitor of the Ark is 032 you fool! 

    There is no 032, because all the monitor numbers are multiples of 7.


    WAR IS PEACE
    FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
    IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

    Big Brother is watching you.
  •  12-17-2009, 11:43 AM 788273 in reply to 788271

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    Feed Nacho Man:

     First off- I call upon the ancient powers of Jal'Harak'Nos to summon this thread's soul and bind it to its material body!

    DFang:

    //008//The monitor of the Ark is 032 you fool! 

    There is no 032, because all the monitor numbers are multiples of 7.


    Do you enjoy reviving long dead threads or something

    Aloysius:If you think about it, Galactus is a giant purple alien who eats planets. Kind of like the Covenant.

    wolver frog
    It's official, straight from the mouth of an employee who works on Halo.

    The Covenant eat planets.
  •  12-19-2009, 7:22 PM 789794 in reply to 788273

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    Yes. But only ones I like. XD
    WAR IS PEACE
    FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
    IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

    Big Brother is watching you.
  •  12-19-2009, 8:05 PM 789822 in reply to 789794

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    BTW

    <head>

    </head>

    <body>

    </body>

    <nuts>

    insert kick

    </nuts>


    WAR IS PEACE
    FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
    IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

    Big Brother is watching you.
  •  12-19-2009, 8:07 PM 789824 in reply to 789822

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    To has, or not to has..... That is teh question.
    I am Aloysius's best cub scout!

    But now I have a new heart to win over.
Page 5 of 6 (83 items)   « First ... < Previous 2 3 4 5 6 Next >
View as RSS news feed in XML