CombatGeneral: US would would trump the UNSC spaceships in orbit.
- Defense Nuclear Missiles
False statements are bad.
Nuclear missiles would easily be shot down by tactical counter missiles. Archer missiles are easily capable of shooting down the missiles if they even made it to the ships.
US Navy would trump the UNSC.
I will do this in a small amount of words as I don't feel like repeating the points I have been making for the past 20 pages.
- Cruisers can launch missiles
The UNSC's superior air/space control would make Cruisers useless in battle. And one point since the UNSC can easily dominate space, they can easily pick off satellites, making any tactical assault against them near impossible, making any victory impossible.
- Battleships can bombard Land targets
No satellites mean no long-range communications. And UNSC Bombers can easily take out a Battleship without them managing a defense.
- Nimitz Aircraft Carriers can travel anywhere at 30 knots, send off 85+ aircraft and don't have to refuel because of two nuclear Engines.
UNSC Destroyers can travel FTL and launch hundreds of ships and vehicles.
- Nuclear Subs could go undetected and launch nuclear missiles from the safety of the ocean.
Missiles would be shot down.
And UNSC Nukes are far more effective, and without communications due to a combined assault against satellites and AIs hacking communication relays, the US, no the whole damned world would be defenseless.
US Airforce would trump the UNSC
Again, no.
- F22 Raptor Air Supremecy (Look it up if you disagree)
UNSC Shortsword and UNSC Longsword. Look up if you disagree. Despite thier superior weaponry and control, they also have exoatmospheric capabilities, making them far more useful for long range attacks or even for aerial combat.
- Radar
Not even worth it.
- Hell Fire Drones
Useless when they have no way of conveying information back to headquarters.
US Army would trump the UNSC Marines. Although the ODST would be hard to beat in cities.
They would lose in numbers and in armor/weapons. Not to mention ODSTs could eaily be dropped into capitals to capture leaders.
- Javelin Missile System takes out any ground vehicles
Missile pods take out Air and Land vehicles. Not to mention Rocket Launchers.
- We have gun systems that allow soldiers to look around corners without exposing the body.
Despite the fact that they haven't been massively deplyed they would also be useless against the UNSC's superior numbers and armor. Any possible weapon advantage is useless against superior armor and numbers.
- Abrams Tank vs Scorpion - I would go with Abrams
Last f*cking 20 pages...
- MIM-104 Patriot would destroy incoming missiles and aircraft
Mmmm, what was that? No intel? Oh I suppose that's game over.
Against the Covenant the US would definitely Lose!
Yea and against UNSC they lose just as bad. Plus if the UNSC really wanted to kill the modern US they would just launch nukes through Slipspace, which we would not be able to detect or stop. They did this against Pegasi Delta.
Fun Fact: "The British Ministry of Defence captured the attention of the global media in October 2007, when it announced that it had successfully made a tank invisible to the human eye. The tank is coated in silicon, effectively turning the vehicle into a highly reflective movie screen. Video cameras positioned on the tank take real-time footage of the surrounding environment, and projectors show the images on the surface of the tank."
Interesting.
Fun fact: The Prototype NOVA bomb is capable of annihilating continent sized pieces of land and obliterating an atmosphere. Ask the residents of Joyous Exultation. Oh wait...
"Die?"Kurt laughed."Didn't you know?"he told the Elite. "...Spartans never die."