I think AT-AT.But you just cant count out the Scarab.Which do you think is beter.

 

 

 

---

Death is a part of life.
So how are you going to go out?

scarab it has a semi automatic stream of plasma while the at-at just has 2 turrets

---

Check out my first FF A brute's tale now on a website near you.

Why another Halo vs. Star Wars thread? They will never end I guess.......

Btw, scarab.

---

In my times, the darkened days,
Evil invaded the world.
We farmers,
We workers of the Red Union,
We united and slaughtered them all.
The brave soul,
Above the evil,
Planted our inspiration atop their burning cities.
- Ruski

actually 4. main and seciondary turrets

---

Death is a part of life.
So how are you going to go out?

Second Lieutenant Kyle Bradley:

Why another Halo vs. Star Wars thread? They will never end I guess.......

Btw, scarab.

the scarab's plasma would burn a hole right in an AT-AT

---

Kyle they will end.You will know when  >:)

---

Death is a part of life.
So how are you going to go out?

...do i HAVE to explain the power source for Star Wars lasers? Fine! ok! (please correct me if im wrong)

 Star Wars lasers use spin sealed tibbana(sp) gas whice is super compressed and heated to well above plasma levels. it is then focused down a lense which intensifies it tenfold. Thats just the standard lasers as well(which the AT-AT has 2 of [ left hand side of head]). The AT-ATs main weapon is twin light turbolasers which uses fusion and the same above method to produce tremendous power. Its final weapon is a (i think) grenade launcher on the right hand side of its head.

 The AT-AT also has (looks at book) two feet of Durasteel armour plating and can hold (looks again) ether 12 speeder bikes, 25 troops or 2 AT-ST's. In addition the AT-AT is 22 meters high.

 so i think i would choose the AT-AT

 

dude...thatts like asking who would win?the death star?or the halo rings..

SCARAB that punny at-at would never stand a chance verse the sacarb especialy scine the scarb has a huge magnumvifed hunter gun and huge gun on top so yea scarab vs at-at=scarab wins

---

United we stand, Divided we fall...-Cpt.Minime

minime151245:

dude...thatts like asking who would win?the death star?or the halo rings..

SCARAB that punny at-at would never stand a chance verse the sacarb especialy scine the scarb has a huge magnumvifed hunter gun and huge gun on top so yea scarab vs at-at=scarab wins

yea you got the plasma turrets,anti air gun on top,then the main gun,+ boarders that normally have fuel rod guns

---

Read my post and cringe at my knowlage

Dude, Scarab VS AT-AT thats like asking Sherman VS M1 Abrams (spelling) AT-AT would win without a breach in its hull.

---

I want a sheep for Christmas...
I want a goat too. I can breed them and make a Soat. (Or a Geep)

Go Blue!!!

yea but the scarab has many support units such as fuel rod grunts and bording elites

on BattleFront 2 about 2 cannons could distory the AT AT the scarab took on a whole army of unsc marines on old mossmbsa,and i may remind you guys that the only reason they won was because they trapped it and A SPARTAN who of witch could kill 5 jedis because a few clones could kill them borded it and destoryed it and the halo 3 one would be sorta harder because it could self repair and it has more turrets and brutes with brute shots and other things.it'd be like this if it was a brute vs some clones.

Brute would = wookie

wookie is rly strong cause if you play republic commando then you saw that one dude kill aton of tranasotions that'd basicly be the brute cheiftan

so wookie cheiftan vs a few bording clones....we all know who would win

so the scarab vs the at at still = scarab wins

 

ps-i will destory you all to find a pie! 

---

United we stand, Divided we fall...-Cpt.Minime

i say the AT-AT cuz it Rox

---

ooooh you touch my tralalala, mmmm my ding ding dong :P

minime151245:

yea but the scarab has many support units such as fuel rod grunts and bording elites

on BattleFront 2 about 2 cannons could distory the AT AT the scarab took on a whole army of unsc marines on old mossmbsa,and i may remind you guys that the only reason they won was because they trapped it and A SPARTAN who of witch could kill 5 jedis because a few clones could kill them borded it and destoryed it and the halo 3 one would be sorta harder because it could self repair and it has more turrets and brutes with brute shots and other things.it'd be like this if it was a brute vs some clones.

Brute would = wookie

wookie is rly strong cause if you play republic commando then you saw that one dude kill aton of tranasotions that'd basicly be the brute cheiftan

so wookie cheiftan vs a few bording clones....we all know who would win

so the scarab vs the at at still = scarab wins

 

ps-i will destory you all to find a pie! 

 

oh my god... Taking facts from Battlefront two...THE END IS NIGH!

 dont talk about things you dont understand.

 Spartans in no way shape or form = Jedi. end of discussion.

 Clones have better weaponry than the covenant, better ships and better vehicles.

scarab has more agiliity,semi-auto HUGE *** lazer,secondary auto gun,so i think scarab would win even if the at-at has a more powerful gun...1 shot at the at-at's leg and it will go down...but MABY the at-at could win...maby

---

we will always remember...
Linda-058,dud_doodoo,
ES,Thunder,Fenix

Ryzza,sparhawk,bacon,vigil,Rotaretilbo
mr.grenade,ARTEMIS,Arbiter,robborboy
BBJynne,grey101,AI,AWSOME,Felix
Oynx,rasq',oOffensive bias,NT,TN
Legandary Halo,Boot,Aukele,Paragon