Halo Universe vs. the U.S.

Last post 11-19-2009, 2:57 PM by DFang. 592 replies.
Page 9 of 40 (593 items)   « First ... < Previous 7 8 9 10 11 Next > ... Last »
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  05-22-2009, 9:35 PM 598668 in reply to 598656

    Re: Halo Universe vs. the U.S.

    I'm going to have to back Felix up,

    A cryo bomb has a certain radius and last for a certain period of time(that's if it can do it's job and freeze crap). EMP- Can be activated in an area for as long as the government would like. The AoE in an EMP can be larger than that of a Cryo Bomb. I'd take EMP over the cryo.

    A regular MAC round can cause heavy damage to a planet...A super MAC can do much, much, much worse. If the core of the planet is damaged, then it's best to leave the planet ASAP. A MAC round is very, very dangerous...

    (And just don't go by what HW's has in it's story line. The books information is much more reliable.)


    Aloysius:
    3. Mandatory search bar usage.

    __________________________________________
    http://s3.invisionfree.com/WWII_Domination/ (WWII forum game, still being worked on. Halo game, will soon follow)
  •  05-22-2009, 9:40 PM 598672 in reply to 598653

    Re: Halo Universe vs. the U.S.

    halo wars is canon as far cut scenes and story is concerned.
  •  05-22-2009, 9:41 PM 598675 in reply to 598672

    Re: Halo Universe vs. the U.S.

    Slayer 2277:halo wars is canon as far cut scenes and story is concerned.

    nope, not at all


    MY POST COUNT IS OVER 9,000!!!
    Bow before me mortals!
    banned, for no good reason. I will be back though, and I intend to kick some serious ass...
  •  05-22-2009, 9:48 PM 598680 in reply to 598653

    Re: Halo Universe vs. the U.S.

    halo wars is considered canon as far as cut scenes and story is concerned.
  •  05-22-2009, 9:48 PM 598681 in reply to 598668

    Re: Halo Universe vs. the U.S.

    Fyrhawk:

    I'm going to have to back Felix up,

    A cryo bomb has a certain radius and last for a certain period of time(that's if it can do it's job and freeze crap). EMP- Can be activated in an area for as long as the government would like. The AoE in an EMP can be larger than that of a Cryo Bomb. I'd take EMP over the cryo.

    A regular MAC round can cause heavy damage to a planet...A super MAC can do much, much, much worse. If the core of the planet is damaged, then it's best to leave the planet ASAP. A MAC round is very, very dangerous...

    (And just don't go by what HW's has in it's story line. The books information is much more reliable.)

    I have never disregarded the power of an EMP, I was merely stating the power of a Cryo-bomb that we can not currently possess as a nation.  I was also merely stating, to refute the point that it's completely feasible for a Cryo-bomb to even work (according to Felix, it's impossible for one to be feasible to work.  Along with Vultures).

    I never disregarded a MAC's strength too, in fact I praised it in my previous post.  I said it was a powerful force, and there is little to no defense for it.  However: It can not reach the core of a planet unless dozens were shot completely accurately.  Maybe not dozens, however you get my point.  I am saying, that he is WRONG when he says a SINGLE -REGULAR- MAC blast can completely decimate a planet to little or no return.

    I also don't just rely on the books.  I also rely on logic, I mean I look at it like this: 500 years in the future.  So much can be researched.  I mean, in the last 100 years we researched: Flying machines, blimps, helicopters, cars, automatic weapons, high powered rifles, scopes, tanks, nuclear warfare, nanotechnology, space travel, and much more.  So what's to say in -500 years- that something as potentially revolutionary as a cryo-bomb, or a Vulture, is completely impossible to ever happen.  Hm, Felix?

    Note: An AI can probably go into the computers of said nation (in this case, the U.S.) and say goodbye to the EMP.  In our case, an EMP does not affect ground forces (generally).  A cryo-bomb may be temporary, however as I said there are more effects than in-game mechanics that take into effect.  Such as slicked roads, and ice doens't dissolve THAT fast.  It would be there for a bit longer, unless you were in Death Valley of course :P


    Aloysius:
    -Less than half a of percent of players have the General rank on Xbox Live.


    How is the General rank fair again?

    Halo Fanboys. The next most annoying thing next to Jonas Brothers fanboys.
  •  05-22-2009, 9:48 PM 598682 in reply to 598680

    Re: Halo Universe vs. the U.S.

    Slayer 2277:halo wars is considered canon as far as cut scenes and story is concerned.

    nope, not at all.


    MY POST COUNT IS OVER 9,000!!!
    Bow before me mortals!
    banned, for no good reason. I will be back though, and I intend to kick some serious ass...
  •  05-22-2009, 9:48 PM 598683 in reply to 598565

    Re: Halo Universe vs. the U.S.

    Korther:

    Would we lose to an army from 500-600 years ago? Hardly, we'd completely demolish them.  Let us look, at the various UNSC future technologies:

    ODST's/Hell Jumpers - Can send in dozens, if not hundreds of units roughly equivelant to our Rangers/Green Berets in a matter of a minute onto any place on the battlefield that a man can walk on and something can fall on.

    Flamethrower Squads - For those of you who don't know, it's against international law (or at least U.S. military law) to use flamethrowers of any kind in military combat.

    Hawks/Hornets - Let me put it like this.  They have better bullets than our helicopters machine guns, they can strafe MUCH better than our helicopters who rely on a single overhead roter.  Hornets are MUCH more flexible, and can carry two units on them with any weapon they want.  Hawks have lazers, and plus Hawks/Hornets would be flying overhead dodging every missle shot at them (or most).  You know those anti-air vehicles we have? Would be generally worthless.

    Cobras - Shots of PURE energy, can tear apart our armored vehicles.  Maybe even garrisoned buildings.

    Sniper Rifles - Please note, that the UNSC sniper rifles are roughly equivelant to our .50 Calibers, all of them.  Let me also note, that .50 Calibers in the U.S. are banned from being used against personell, however not so much for the UNSC even though they are not called .50 calibers.  And even though it's not in Halo 1,2,3; physically, a gun's bullet that strong (and it's been shown from our .50 cal) that comes within a foot of you, will TEAR the flesh off your skin.

    Vultures - I want you to imagine an F-16's or F-22's Javeline Missle, or any other form of missle.  Then I want you to imagine about 10-12 of those, being shot at once in a single direction.  I want you to imagine four cannons, able to be shot semi-automatically that shoot something roughly equivelant to tank shells.  Then put that in a highly armored, space capable flying machine.

    Pelicans - We can transport armor, personell, and even supplies much more efficiently on the field with these.  A pelican can hold, what 16 men or something? Dropped off anywhere, then you can add a Scorpion tank with that.  That's pretty darn good reinforcements for one pelican, now add in 5 of those.  Now we got paratroopers, however those are generally innacurate in landing and can not transport armor.  I suppose we have Black Hawks, however those carry what, 8 men and no vehicles possible? Might I also add, are much more vulnerable to weapons fire.

    Mac Blast - A kinetic strike, capable of taking out, oh let us say the White House in a single shot.  The Pentagon in like, two.  This has such destructive capability, with no way to strike back. 

    Cryo-Bomb - Self explanatory.  Dropping extreme cold, can stop an entire helicoptor advancement from the U.S., can stop an entire army in it's tracks, etc.

    Battle Ships - I want to point this out to everyone.  Spirit of Fire is NOT a warship.  That was a colonial ship, that was turned into a fighting ship.  War ships are what we saw in like, Halo 1, 2, 3.  Those things were MUCH bigger, and much more powerful.  We can not hope to take these things down, especially in the outer-atmosphere without using a Nuke at the least.  Which the Nuclear Fallout would affect everyone within a very wide range of the explosion due to the radiation.  Plus, each war-ship can hold THOUSANDS of armor and aribourne units.  Tens, if not hundreds of thousands of units per battleship.  Like, 12 battle-ships can outnumber our entire army 2 to 1.

    Spartans - Can dodge bullets...

    Rocket Launcher - Short and sweet this one is.  Can fire two rockets at a time, and reloads faster than it takes to reload one of our Rocket Launchers.  Which only fires 1 rocket at a time, by the way.

    Note: Please don't use the crappy Halo 1/2/3 Marine AI as an excuse to say the UNSC will lose.  It's a very moot point.

    First of all let me say that I'm am siding with the US because of the fact I think they are better.

    To felix: 

    OK, first of all, you can't compare an f-22/35(fighter) to a longsword(bomber/SPACE fighter) what you can compare though is the B2-stealth, or better yet the SR-71 blackbird. And in this case, the SR-71 would win because of its mach 3 capabilities and its undetectable by radar.

    Abrams would a scorpion any day, more armor,weaponry,power(abrams 120mm cannon, scorp 105 mm shells) and speed(45 mph, scorp looks like only 25 or so).

    AIs could infiltrate the system but they would just cut the hard lines, and next time they are in the verge of getting hack they could, would, destroy all data in their hard drives, sound familiar?

    Spartans would make a difference but there are only 3 alive that are ready for deployment(gray team, "halo:cole protocol"). They wouldn't change much.

    Yes, the UNSC had survived the first halo with superior tactics, but to WHOM were they superior to? The covenant, which if you hadn't noticed doesn't rely on tactics but superior tech and vast numbers. The US on the other hand actually uses tactics to prevent casualties. Aslo, you don't see a blackhawk go down a lot because we are fighting un-organized terrorist who use RPGs where we would use AtA/GtA missiles(air-to-air/ground-to-air) to take down air units.

    Also, the army Rangers,Green Berets and Seals are superior to the ODSTs, and thats not counting spec ops soldier from other countries like the SAS and the spetsnaz. Also, the current US marines are highly trained compared to the US army, which I'm pretty sure is what they use but call them "marines" due to the fact that they ride on ships. 

    ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    To Kordude

    They are practically ordinary marines but with training to use a HEV. They are nothing like the green Berets or Rangers. If you can, please tell me where it says they have much more extensive training then ordinary marines(not counting HEV training).

    Flamers are banned :'( 

    An F-35 would rape a hawk and don't tell me bout the hornets. F-35 has a vertical propulsion system, allowing it to strafe, rotate and even stop in mid-air. Also, the hawk's lasers can easily miss other flying aircraft as can other forms of lasers(try taking out a banshee with a gauss hog without missing a shot, now have that but faster = F-35) while we have missiles that can lock on to transmission signals rather than heat(which can be tricked by flares).

    Cobras are powerful but can easily be stopped by an abrams tank.

    .50 cal snipers are not banned from war. Also, the halo sniper isn't a .50 cal, its ammunition is only 114 mm and 50. rounds are bout 138 mm, still big though.

     Vulture are giant flying targets of doom, meaning that a goo f-35/22 strike will destroy it in seconds. Not really worth the cost if it could get destroyed easily. 

    The MH-53 pave low can hold a max cap of 55 passengers, not counting the 6 man crew. It also has 3 .50 machine gun place on the sides and rear, along with a chin gun. Though it cannot go into space, its excellent for combat search and rescue and drop off. They can also lift armor and take it the battlefield.

    2 mac blast CANNOT take out the pentagon. The pentagon can withstand NUCLEAR blast, didn't you noticed that when the plane hit, it barely did anything? The pentagon also have over 5 floors underground of concrete and reinforced steel within each wall and floor. As for the mac, yes it is an advantage but I am ruling out anything to do with space.

    A real life cryo bomb would KILL the people it affects, not just freeze them like in the game.

    Warships. The warships you are talking about CANNOT go planet side. Only small warships and colonial ships can do that, but even if you used only colonial ships, you would still out number us. But that wouldn't be an even fight now would it?

    Spartans, overrated. Like I said earlier^  only 3 would be available for you to use and 3 would make much of a big difference.

    Rocket launchers. I don't know if you know this but the US marine core uses disposable rocket launchers, as in one use only. This allows them to lighten their load once they use them. Since they are small, light(less then 20 lbs) and disposable, every marine can carrie one without leaving behind their primary weapon. So once your rocket guy runs out of ammo he is screwed because isn't going to walk around with heavy rocket launcher, ammo for it, normal supplies PLUS his assault rifle and clips so he has to use his pistol while our guys have rockets and a machine gun/shotgun/rifle.

    Please Note that we would have a pretty even fight but have the US come out the victor if A) all of the world was part of the US(you guys have multiple planets, when we just need 1) and B) you don't add warships/colonial ships into the mix. 


    I survived the flame wars, I survived the newb flood, and now they expect me to start all over just because they added in some stupid live crap? no, I used to go by Dark Medicant Bias but they took it all away. And now, its their turn to try to survive...
  •  05-22-2009, 9:49 PM 598684 in reply to 598680

    Re: Halo Universe vs. the U.S.

    sorry for the double posting.
  •  05-22-2009, 9:50 PM 598685 in reply to 598680

    Re: Halo Universe vs. the U.S.

    Slayer 2277:halo wars is considered canon as far as cut scenes and story is concerned.

    explain...will you?


    Aloysius:
    3. Mandatory search bar usage.

    __________________________________________
    http://s3.invisionfree.com/WWII_Domination/ (WWII forum game, still being worked on. Halo game, will soon follow)
  •  05-22-2009, 9:52 PM 598686 in reply to 598681

    Re: Halo Universe vs. the U.S.

    Korther:
    Fyrhawk:

    I'm going to have to back Felix up,

    A cryo bomb has a certain radius and last for a certain period of time(that's if it can do it's job and freeze crap). EMP- Can be activated in an area for as long as the government would like. The AoE in an EMP can be larger than that of a Cryo Bomb. I'd take EMP over the cryo.

    A regular MAC round can cause heavy damage to a planet...A super MAC can do much, much, much worse. If the core of the planet is damaged, then it's best to leave the planet ASAP. A MAC round is very, very dangerous...

    (And just don't go by what HW's has in it's story line. The books information is much more reliable.)

    I have never disregarded the power of an EMP, I was merely stating the power of a Cryo-bomb that we can not currently possess as a nation.  I was also merely stating, to refute the point that it's completely feasible for a Cryo-bomb to even work (according to Felix, it's impossible for one to be feasible to work.  Along with Vultures).

    I never disregarded a MAC's strength too, in fact I praised it in my previous post.  I said it was a powerful force, and there is little to no defense for it.  However: It can not reach the core of a planet unless dozens were shot completely accurately.  Maybe not dozens, however you get my point.  I am saying, that he is WRONG when he says a SINGLE -REGULAR- MAC blast can completely decimate a planet to little or no return.

    I also don't just rely on the books.  I also rely on logic, I mean I look at it like this: 500 years in the future.  So much can be researched.  I mean, in the last 100 years we researched: Flying machines, blimps, helicopters, cars, automatic weapons, high powered rifles, scopes, tanks, nuclear warfare, nanotechnology, space travel, and much more.  So what's to say in -500 years- that something as potentially revolutionary as a cryo-bomb, or a Vulture, is completely impossible to ever happen.  Hm, Felix?

    It's not about what time period it is, or how long it takes to discover something.  The UNSC don't have certain things because they don't.  They can't make a cryo "bomb" practical, they can't make a "gunship" hover. 

    The MAC would destroy the ecosystem of a planet, which would lead to the descruction of the planet(As I've pointed out several times now).

    Your "logic" does not apply to the halo universe. 


    MY POST COUNT IS OVER 9,000!!!
    Bow before me mortals!
    banned, for no good reason. I will be back though, and I intend to kick some serious ass...
  •  05-22-2009, 9:58 PM 598692 in reply to 598683

    Re: Halo Universe vs. the U.S.

     Sorry if it's out of order from your post...

    Just a quick response before I go to bed.  To "Shining Knight"

    .50 Calibers are banned from being used against INFANTRY.  Not VEHICLES.  It's "inhumane" apparently. 

    Those warships can still carry many many infantry and weaponry, and the fact that they can not go planet-side even increases their effectiveness in the defensive realm.

    So what if an Abram (sp?) can take out a Cobra? A cobra can take out an Abram, it's all a matter of situation.  However weapon wise, the Cobra is superior.

    Cryo Bomb - You just really helped my point a bit more with your clarification :)

    Is the MH-53 the primary unit transport for the United States? (IE: Used en masse).  Not really, while they are good they are not used as extensively as the Black Hawk and other.

    Yes, while a Vulture is a giant target of doom: With the proper protection, it can completely decimate entire forces.  I mean, an Aircraft carrier can be taken out by a few F-22's, does that make it worthless as well?

    You are comparing an equivalent to a helicopter to a jet.  Not really going to fly with me, sorry.  I want to see an Apache (or other) go against a Hornet/Hawk.

     You can't ignore Warships, they are a vital part of the battlefield.  Like I said, pardon me if this is innacurate but I think about 12 Warships can surround our world extensively and bring millions (I think) into the battlefield as reinforcements.

    Pardon me, I assumed a bit that the ODST's were trained more extensively than regular marines.  NEVERTHELESS! The strategic genious of being able to deploy hundreds of units almost instantly in any area can turn the tide of the battle well over 90% of the time.  

     


    Aloysius:
    -Less than half a of percent of players have the General rank on Xbox Live.


    How is the General rank fair again?

    Halo Fanboys. The next most annoying thing next to Jonas Brothers fanboys.
  •  05-22-2009, 9:59 PM 598693 in reply to 598686

    Re: Halo Universe vs. the U.S.

    The MAC would destroy the planet's ecosystem. The HW MAC is seriously underpowered for game balancing reasons, but a real MAC would be as strong as a nuclear bomb, maybe stronger. That would cause enormos amounts of dust to rise into the upper atmosphere causing nuclear winter for millions of years. Also, if they aimed the MAC at a dormant supervolcano...well you get the idea...

     Oh, and ODST are better than modern spec-ops. They are the 26th century equivalent of the SAS and they are freakin' good (just not in Halo).

     Cryo bombs are totally easy to make (we could make one now if we really wanted to). Just make a compressed air bomb and fill it with liquid nitrogen. Viola...


    Everything is overpowered!!!
  •  05-22-2009, 10:00 PM 598695 in reply to 598686

    Re: Halo Universe vs. the U.S.

    Felix:
    Korther:
    Fyrhawk:

    I'm going to have to back Felix up,

    A cryo bomb has a certain radius and last for a certain period of time(that's if it can do it's job and freeze crap). EMP- Can be activated in an area for as long as the government would like. The AoE in an EMP can be larger than that of a Cryo Bomb. I'd take EMP over the cryo.

    A regular MAC round can cause heavy damage to a planet...A super MAC can do much, much, much worse. If the core of the planet is damaged, then it's best to leave the planet ASAP. A MAC round is very, very dangerous...

    (And just don't go by what HW's has in it's story line. The books information is much more reliable.)

    I have never disregarded the power of an EMP, I was merely stating the power of a Cryo-bomb that we can not currently possess as a nation.  I was also merely stating, to refute the point that it's completely feasible for a Cryo-bomb to even work (according to Felix, it's impossible for one to be feasible to work.  Along with Vultures).

    I never disregarded a MAC's strength too, in fact I praised it in my previous post.  I said it was a powerful force, and there is little to no defense for it.  However: It can not reach the core of a planet unless dozens were shot completely accurately.  Maybe not dozens, however you get my point.  I am saying, that he is WRONG when he says a SINGLE -REGULAR- MAC blast can completely decimate a planet to little or no return.

    I also don't just rely on the books.  I also rely on logic, I mean I look at it like this: 500 years in the future.  So much can be researched.  I mean, in the last 100 years we researched: Flying machines, blimps, helicopters, cars, automatic weapons, high powered rifles, scopes, tanks, nuclear warfare, nanotechnology, space travel, and much more.  So what's to say in -500 years- that something as potentially revolutionary as a cryo-bomb, or a Vulture, is completely impossible to ever happen.  Hm, Felix?

    It's not about what time period it is, or how long it takes to discover something.  The UNSC don't have certain things because they don't.  They can't make a cryo "bomb" practical, they can't make a "gunship" hover. 

    The MAC would destroy the ecosystem of a planet, which would lead to the descruction of the planet(As I've pointed out several times now).

    Your "logic" does not apply to the halo universe. 

    Just a few points, for you.

    1. You said that they can't harness Liquid Nitrogen, that's wrong.

    2. I'm SUPPORTING that the UNSC would win the fight.  So the fact that you are so valiantly defending that a single MAC strike can take out an entire world is just helping me even more.

    3. So if they can't make a gunship hover, I wonder how they make a giant *** warship that can travel through space hover....


    Aloysius:
    -Less than half a of percent of players have the General rank on Xbox Live.


    How is the General rank fair again?

    Halo Fanboys. The next most annoying thing next to Jonas Brothers fanboys.
  •  05-22-2009, 10:04 PM 598698 in reply to 598693

    Re: Halo Universe vs. the U.S.

    HighArkAngel:

    The MAC would destroy the planet's ecosystem. The HW MAC is seriously underpowered for game balancing reasons, but a real MAC would be as strong as a nuclear bomb, maybe stronger. That would cause enormos amounts of dust to rise into the upper atmosphere causing nuclear winter for millions of years. Also, if they aimed the MAC at a dormant supervolcano...well you get the idea...

    True, it depends on where it's going.  However, a single nuclear strike wont cause nuclear fallout/radiation for 'millions of years'.  Look at Shinoble (sp?) in Russia.  A nuclear power plant that was LOADED with uranium, etc had the potential to spread across a bit of Russia and most of Eastern Europe exploded (It didn't go that far, due to the bravest souls in the world who spent the last moments of their life preventing it from being that bad)

    However, let me proceed.  It wouldn't spread out throughout the entire world.  While it would cause Nuclear fallout for a long, long time.  I would put it at a Century at the -most- in terms of radiation.  Excluding other factors (IE: Where they hit and what they hit).  I don't doubt for a second, that a jacked up MAC can do massive damage to a few mile radius.  However worldwide? Hardly.


    Aloysius:
    -Less than half a of percent of players have the General rank on Xbox Live.


    How is the General rank fair again?

    Halo Fanboys. The next most annoying thing next to Jonas Brothers fanboys.
  •  05-22-2009, 10:04 PM 598699 in reply to 598695

    Re: Halo Universe vs. the U.S.

    The UNSC basically have to be better than modern military. How can it be possible that 500 years of scientific research has made our military worse???

     And im pretty sure in 500 years, we will have good hover technology...


    Everything is overpowered!!!
Page 9 of 40 (593 items)   « First ... < Previous 7 8 9 10 11 Next > ... Last »
View as RSS news feed in XML