Free base builing would totally work. Worker units would also perhaps have to be added, or atleast I would like them to be added.

"being able to actually make good BO because you can build more than 1 building at a time is a must!"

Not really. A good build order doesn't come from another production que. CnC had an option where you couldbuild another production que straight away, it didn' cost so much, and didn't take that long to build, but no one good ever made one in the first 7 buildings. Second production ques early on often fail. I think SC is practicly the only exception.

---

Arbiter is 1337!

whitemage:

annihilator41:

UNBELIEVABLE:

The Kelvinator:

Isn't this pretty much the same as the UNSC vs Covenant factions remade thread started by Shadow Titan?

Why wasn't this taken there.

Unbelievable and I are pretty much the sole inhabitants there. We need some fresh ideas... 

I know,there is alot of unanswered questions on that thread,i still have to finish a few things on it,i dont know why on earth they swapped threads.

But dont be fooled,there is no new ideas because if you look carefully,you will notice that Dfang and shadow have finally figured out what free building is, they just phrased it differently but its the exact same as free base building.

Examples- boundary= territory/sector.(shadow),invisable slots = to regular ground.(Dfang)

Just out of interest did anyone else notice that,THATS WHAT FREE BUILDING IS,EXACT SAME AS YOU DESCRIBED.

I dont think that free building would work with this kind of rts game ,and we dont want to fix something that doesnt need fixing.

free building is a must! they can make it like red alert 3.

being able to actually make good BO because you can build more than 1 building at a time is a must!

Look at the games that had free building examples are C&C3,LOTR Battle for Middle Earth 2,and Kanes Wrath. If everybody didnt notice those games are dead. And considering that Halo Wars is the best out of them for the xbox 360 we shouldnt try to fix it. What would make the game better would be a forge like in Halo 3. A theatre so you can record games that you played. Also more leaders and units and a ton of maps so we dont get the same 3 maps all the time.

---

2v3 win-http://www.halowars.com/stats/StatsGame.aspx?Id=17921612-9568-5520-6180-000000000000

Unofficial Halo Wars 2 thread http://www.halowars.com/forums/thread/774610.aspx

You nerfed the only thing left with life the ARBITER!

UNBELIEVABLE:

Arbiter 1337:I do enjoy HW, and would probably buy a second. But im not sure they could expand enough to justify a second.

Go back to pg 4, thats what can be done.

Those ideas arn't very good.

Custom armies, 5 tech levels, no RPS....really?

I don't know what game you was playing but RPS worked for me.

---

Arbiter is 1337!

annihilator41:

whitemage:

annihilator41:

UNBELIEVABLE:

The Kelvinator:

Isn't this pretty much the same as the UNSC vs Covenant factions remade thread started by Shadow Titan?

Why wasn't this taken there.

Unbelievable and I are pretty much the sole inhabitants there. We need some fresh ideas... 

I know,there is alot of unanswered questions on that thread,i still have to finish a few things on it,i dont know why on earth they swapped threads.

But dont be fooled,there is no new ideas because if you look carefully,you will notice that Dfang and shadow have finally figured out what free building is, they just phrased it differently but its the exact same as free base building.

Examples- boundary= territory/sector.(shadow),invisable slots = to regular ground.(Dfang)

Just out of interest did anyone else notice that,THATS WHAT FREE BUILDING IS,EXACT SAME AS YOU DESCRIBED.

I dont think that free building would work with this kind of rts game ,and we dont want to fix something that doesnt need fixing.

free building is a must! they can make it like red alert 3.

being able to actually make good BO because you can build more than 1 building at a time is a must!

Look at the games that had free building examples are C&C3,LOTR Battle for Middle Earth 2,and Kanes Wrath. If everybody didnt notice those games are dead. And considering that Halo Wars is the best out of them for the xbox 360 we shouldnt try to fix it. What would make the game better would be a forge like in Halo 3. A theatre so you can record games that you played. Also more leaders and units and a ton of maps so we dont get the same 3 maps all the time.

Wars was only sucessful because it was a halo,if it wasn't it would just be neglected like C&C,for instance would you buy it if it was called C&C WARS.No you wouldn't,C&C is so much better and of course its dead,its been out 2 years longer,lets look at halo wars in 2 years.50 players max at one time. Those 4 letters, H A L O, make the world of difference. Halo would have been sucessful if it was free build,fixed bases,RTS or anything,as long as its halo it will sell.Argue with that.

Arbiter 1337:

UNBELIEVABLE:

Arbiter 1337:I do enjoy HW, and would probably buy a second. But im not sure they could expand enough to justify a second.

Go back to pg 4, thats what can be done.

Those ideas arn't very good.

Custom armies, 5 tech levels, no RPS....really?

I don't know what game you was playing but RPS worked for me.

ya it works but do you really want something that will get work to get you by or something for longevity. Which one would be best to keep the game fresh and real?

---

2v3 win-http://www.halowars.com/stats/StatsGame.aspx?Id=17921612-9568-5520-6180-000000000000

Unofficial Halo Wars 2 thread http://www.halowars.com/forums/thread/774610.aspx

You nerfed the only thing left with life the ARBITER!

Arbiter 1337:

UNBELIEVABLE:

Arbiter 1337:I do enjoy HW, and would probably buy a second. But im not sure they could expand enough to justify a second.

Go back to pg 4, thats what can be done.

I don't know what game you was playing but RPS worked for me.

You diddnt even write the sentence properly and your telling me which is best RTS.seriously...

Im sorry if im offending anyone but its common sense,and nobody is telling me whats wrong with it they are just saying its wrong,thats no help at all.

annihilator41:

whitemage:

annihilator41:

UNBELIEVABLE:

The Kelvinator:

Isn't this pretty much the same as the UNSC vs Covenant factions remade thread started by Shadow Titan?

Why wasn't this taken there.

Unbelievable and I are pretty much the sole inhabitants there. We need some fresh ideas... 

I know,there is alot of unanswered questions on that thread,i still have to finish a few things on it,i dont know why on earth they swapped threads.

But dont be fooled,there is no new ideas because if you look carefully,you will notice that Dfang and shadow have finally figured out what free building is, they just phrased it differently but its the exact same as free base building.

Examples- boundary= territory/sector.(shadow),invisable slots = to regular ground.(Dfang)

Just out of interest did anyone else notice that,THATS WHAT FREE BUILDING IS,EXACT SAME AS YOU DESCRIBED.

I dont think that free building would work with this kind of rts game ,and we dont want to fix something that doesnt need fixing.

free building is a must! they can make it like red alert 3.

being able to actually make good BO because you can build more than 1 building at a time is a must!

Look at the games that had free building examples are C&C3,LOTR Battle for Middle Earth 2,and Kanes Wrath. If everybody didnt notice those games are dead. And considering that Halo Wars is the best out of them for the xbox 360 we shouldnt try to fix it. What would make the game better would be a forge like in Halo 3. A theatre so you can record games that you played. Also more leaders and units and a ton of maps so we dont get the same 3 maps all the time.

HW's popularity was largely influenced by the word "HALO". The rest comes from the fact its simple, worked on console, easy to pick up and uses familiar units in a familiar Universe.

CnC and the expansion where massively popular on PC. LOTR was a simple "Movie Game" and they never do well. Saying that thogh, it did see some success.

---

Arbiter is 1337!

annihilator41:Will it happen? Do you want it to happen? Will you buy it if it happens? What do you want to change if it does happen?

I hope so. For the love of god yes. I will be at the midnight release if there is one. Better combat system, that little trianglular counter air/ground/ infantry was a fail because they overlooked things like mobility and micro.

 

---

Sl Loboz:

then ethics came, and all was good in the world

UNBELIEVABLE:

annihilator41:

whitemage:

annihilator41:

UNBELIEVABLE:

The Kelvinator:

Isn't this pretty much the same as the UNSC vs Covenant factions remade thread started by Shadow Titan?

Why wasn't this taken there.

Unbelievable and I are pretty much the sole inhabitants there. We need some fresh ideas... 

I know,there is alot of unanswered questions on that thread,i still have to finish a few things on it,i dont know why on earth they swapped threads.

But dont be fooled,there is no new ideas because if you look carefully,you will notice that Dfang and shadow have finally figured out what free building is, they just phrased it differently but its the exact same as free base building.

Examples- boundary= territory/sector.(shadow),invisable slots = to regular ground.(Dfang)

Just out of interest did anyone else notice that,THATS WHAT FREE BUILDING IS,EXACT SAME AS YOU DESCRIBED.

I dont think that free building would work with this kind of rts game ,and we dont want to fix something that doesnt need fixing.

free building is a must! they can make it like red alert 3.

being able to actually make good BO because you can build more than 1 building at a time is a must!

Look at the games that had free building examples are C&C3,LOTR Battle for Middle Earth 2,and Kanes Wrath. If everybody didnt notice those games are dead. And considering that Halo Wars is the best out of them for the xbox 360 we shouldnt try to fix it. What would make the game better would be a forge like in Halo 3. A theatre so you can record games that you played. Also more leaders and units and a ton of maps so we dont get the same 3 maps all the time.

Wars was only sucessful because it was a halo,if it wasn't it would just be neglected like C&C,for instance would you buy it if it was called C&C WARS.No you wouldn't,C&C is so much better and of course its dead,its been out 2 years longer,lets look at halo wars in 2 years.50 players max at one time. Those 4 letters, H A L O, make the world of difference. Halo would have been sucessful if it was free build,fixed bases,RTS or anything,as long as its halo it will sell.Argue with that.

Just so you know i preordered this game before i even knew anything about Halo. Because I was just interested in a good rts because i did not like C&C3 and LOTR BM 2. So I dont care about Halo in the title. I care about is ENSEMBLE Studios made this and that it was an rts with the controls designed  for the Xbox 360.

---

2v3 win-http://www.halowars.com/stats/StatsGame.aspx?Id=17921612-9568-5520-6180-000000000000

Unofficial Halo Wars 2 thread http://www.halowars.com/forums/thread/774610.aspx

You nerfed the only thing left with life the ARBITER!

annihilator41:

Arbiter 1337:

UNBELIEVABLE:

Arbiter 1337:I do enjoy HW, and would probably buy a second. But im not sure they could expand enough to justify a second.

Go back to pg 4, thats what can be done.

Those ideas arn't very good.

Custom armies, 5 tech levels, no RPS....really?

I don't know what game you was playing but RPS worked for me.

fresh and real?

Describes the unit layout on pg 4 so brilliantly,full of stratagy,RPS was so simply you could master it in 5 games.

UNBELIEVABLE:

Arbiter 1337:

UNBELIEVABLE:

Arbiter 1337:I do enjoy HW, and would probably buy a second. But im not sure they could expand enough to justify a second.

Go back to pg 4, thats what can be done.

I don't know what game you was playing but RPS worked for me.

You diddnt even write the sentence properly and your telling me which is best RTS.seriously...

Im sorry if im offending anyone but its common sense,and nobody is telling me whats wrong with it they are just saying its wrong,thats no help at all.

Wow, your such a grammar Nazi. My opinions must be void because I used to wrong tense of the word.

Ill tell you whats wrong with your ideas...Nearly everything. To list all the problems would be such a huge tasks its far simpler to say "Go away and rethink them"

 

---

Arbiter is 1337!

annihilator41:

Arbiter 1337:

UNBELIEVABLE:

Arbiter 1337:I do enjoy HW, and would probably buy a second. But im not sure they could expand enough to justify a second.

Go back to pg 4, thats what can be done.

Those ideas arn't very good.

Custom armies, 5 tech levels, no RPS....really?

I don't know what game you was playing but RPS worked for me.

ya it works but do you really want something that will get work to get you by or something for longevity. Which one would be best to keep the game fresh and real?

Longevity. RPS delivers on that.

If it doesn't work for you, then your thinking it does something it wont. It's an underline soft counter system, nearly all RTS have them. But, hard counters are nearly always better.

---

Arbiter is 1337!

Arbiter 1337:

annihilator41:

Arbiter 1337:

UNBELIEVABLE:

Arbiter 1337:I do enjoy HW, and would probably buy a second. But im not sure they could expand enough to justify a second.

Go back to pg 4, thats what can be done.

Those ideas arn't very good.

Custom armies, 5 tech levels, no RPS....really?

I don't know what game you was playing but RPS worked for me.

ya it works but do you really want something that will get work to get you by or something for longevity. Which one would be best to keep the game fresh and real?

Longevity. RPS delivers on that.

If it doesn't work for you, then your thinking it does something it wont. It's an underline soft counter system, nearly all RTS have them. But, hard counters are nearly always better.

I am not saying get rid of it I just think there could be a lot of other things that should be worked on first. 

---

2v3 win-http://www.halowars.com/stats/StatsGame.aspx?Id=17921612-9568-5520-6180-000000000000

Unofficial Halo Wars 2 thread http://www.halowars.com/forums/thread/774610.aspx

You nerfed the only thing left with life the ARBITER!

annihilator41:

Arbiter 1337:

annihilator41:

Arbiter 1337:

UNBELIEVABLE:

Arbiter 1337:I do enjoy HW, and would probably buy a second. But im not sure they could expand enough to justify a second.

Go back to pg 4, thats what can be done.

Those ideas arn't very good.

Custom armies, 5 tech levels, no RPS....really?

I don't know what game you was playing but RPS worked for me.

ya it works but do you really want something that will get work to get you by or something for longevity. Which one would be best to keep the game fresh and real?

Longevity. RPS delivers on that.

If it doesn't work for you, then your thinking it does something it wont. It's an underline soft counter system, nearly all RTS have them. But, hard counters are nearly always better.

I am not saying get rid of it I just think there could be a lot of other things that should be worked on first. 

If it works, then it doens't need to have time invested on it.

---

Arbiter is 1337!

annihilator41:

UNBELIEVABLE:

annihilator41:

whitemage:

annihilator41:

UNBELIEVABLE:

The Kelvinator:

Isn't this pretty much the same as the UNSC vs Covenant factions remade thread started by Shadow Titan?

Why wasn't this taken there.

Unbelievable and I are pretty much the sole inhabitants there. We need some fresh ideas... 

I know,there is alot of unanswered questions on that thread,i still have to finish a few things on it,i dont know why on earth they swapped threads.

But dont be fooled,there is no new ideas because if you look carefully,you will notice that Dfang and shadow have finally figured out what free building is, they just phrased it differently but its the exact same as free base building.

Examples- boundary= territory/sector.(shadow),invisable slots = to regular ground.(Dfang)

Just out of interest did anyone else notice that,THATS WHAT FREE BUILDING IS,EXACT SAME AS YOU DESCRIBED.

I dont think that free building would work with this kind of rts game ,and we dont want to fix something that doesnt need fixing.

free building is a must! they can make it like red alert 3.

being able to actually make good BO because you can build more than 1 building at a time is a must!

Look at the games that had free building examples are C&C3,LOTR Battle for Middle Earth 2,and Kanes Wrath. If everybody didnt notice those games are dead. And considering that Halo Wars is the best out of them for the xbox 360 we shouldnt try to fix it. What would make the game better would be a forge like in Halo 3. A theatre so you can record games that you played. Also more leaders and units and a ton of maps so we dont get the same 3 maps all the time.

Wars was only sucessful because it was a halo,if it wasn't it would just be neglected like C&C,for instance would you buy it if it was called C&C WARS.No you wouldn't,C&C is so much better and of course its dead,its been out 2 years longer,lets look at halo wars in 2 years.50 players max at one time. Those 4 letters, H A L O, make the world of difference. Halo would have been sucessful if it was free build,fixed bases,RTS or anything,as long as its halo it will sell.Argue with that.

Just so you know i preordered this game before i even knew anything about Halo. Because I was just interested in a good rts because i did not like C&C3 and LOTR BM 2. So I dont care about Halo in the title. I care about is ENSEMBLE Studios made this and that it was an rts with the controls designed  for the Xbox 360.

Then your one of those 50 exceptions,out of the 30,000 who bought the game how many do you think bought it for halo.Point made,a halo game doesnt matter if its fixed bases or free build,it will always be sucessful,simple as.