Robot Entertainment

Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

Last post 11-06-2009, 6:17 PM by eliteempire. 69 replies.
Page 3 of 5 (70 items)   < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next >
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  11-02-2009, 6:09 PM 764214 in reply to 764210

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    32MendicantBias:

    //032// This one believes he know. He cannot stop us.

    //032// You do not understand our forces. Your "Batallion" (({Estimate Strength=: 1157})) cannot withstand our weapons.

    Destruction must not dominate...the Mantle will hold true.

    Mendicant watch the path that was paved by our [predecessors].


    "Die?"Kurt laughed."Didn't you know?"he told the Elite. "...Spartans never die."

    People say Halo fanboys are annoying. They obviously haven't met a CoD fanboy.
  •  11-02-2009, 6:13 PM 764216 in reply to 764214

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    tmspartan:
    32MendicantBias:

    //032// This one believes he know. He cannot stop us.

    //032// You do not understand our forces. Your "Batallion" (({Estimate Strength=: 1157})) cannot withstand our weapons.

    Destruction must not dominate...the Mantle will hold true.

    Mendicant watch the path that was paved by our [predecessors].

    //032// My function is to stop the Parasite and defend my makers.

    //032// My makers are gone. This one [[{RECALL= "Dfang" }]] wishes to restart the horror.

    //032// I will protect those which my makers defended.

    //032// The 100,000 years war is over. It shall remain as such. 

  •  11-02-2009, 6:18 PM 764220 in reply to 764210

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    32MendicantBias:
    DFang:
    32MendicantBias:
    newb hunter 117:
    Korther:

    ....

    No, plasma is not a gas.  

    There are four substances in the universe.

    Solid, Liquid, Gas, and Plasma.  

    Plasma is its own substance.

    It's not gas or liquid or solid--it's just plasma.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_states_of_matter

     http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter

    like i already knew their is so far 7 states of matter and more can be found/discover/made/etc.

    My thought on the whole viability of plama weaponry would be that yes we can and have plasma weaponry.

    We (the human race) do have plasma weaponry but when fired upon target a second shot after would be impossible for it can not legally pass through the same space that the first shot occupied.  This has something to do with the fact that a shield like resident is left in trail and well laws of physics would have to break to allow the second shot to follow suit.

    //032// {Analyzing}

    //032// Determination= Weapon Type 2563342-118

    //032// Your weapons are inferior. My makers can destroy you with no effort.

    Ya know what? I've got a battalion stationed on Installation 03, ready to release your flood buddies and hand them a spaceship at a moments' notice, so watch your trap, got it?

    //032// This one believes he know. He cannot stop us.

    //032// You do not understand our forces. Your "Batallion" (({Estimate Strength=: 1157})) cannot withstand our weapons.

    I said FLOOD.  And *cough* activation index. 


    Whenever a thread has been hijacked and there are big quote boxes and lots of flame, I'll be there!

    I'll be off playing ACII for a couple weeks...

  •  11-02-2009, 6:20 PM 764224 in reply to 764220

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    DFang:
    32MendicantBias:
    DFang:
    32MendicantBias:
    newb hunter 117:
    Korther:

    ....

    No, plasma is not a gas.  

    There are four substances in the universe.

    Solid, Liquid, Gas, and Plasma.  

    Plasma is its own substance.

    It's not gas or liquid or solid--it's just plasma.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_states_of_matter

     http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter

    like i already knew their is so far 7 states of matter and more can be found/discover/made/etc.

    My thought on the whole viability of plama weaponry would be that yes we can and have plasma weaponry.

    We (the human race) do have plasma weaponry but when fired upon target a second shot after would be impossible for it can not legally pass through the same space that the first shot occupied.  This has something to do with the fact that a shield like resident is left in trail and well laws of physics would have to break to allow the second shot to follow suit.

    //032// {Analyzing}

    //032// Determination= Weapon Type 2563342-118

    //032// Your weapons are inferior. My makers can destroy you with no effort.

    Ya know what? I've got a battalion stationed on Installation 03, ready to release your flood buddies and hand them a spaceship at a moments' notice, so watch your trap, got it?

    //032// This one believes he know. He cannot stop us.

    //032// You do not understand our forces. Your "Batallion" (({Estimate Strength=: 1157})) cannot withstand our weapons.

    I said FLOOD.  And *cough* activation index. 

    //032// The Installation's Theta-Class drones will destroy your forces.

    //032// The infestation will be stopped. You cannot defeat the automated systems.

  •  11-02-2009, 6:28 PM 764233 in reply to 764224

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    32MendicantBias:
    DFang:
    32MendicantBias:
    DFang:
    32MendicantBias:
    newb hunter 117:
    Korther:

    ....

    No, plasma is not a gas.  

    There are four substances in the universe.

    Solid, Liquid, Gas, and Plasma.  

    Plasma is its own substance.

    It's not gas or liquid or solid--it's just plasma.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_states_of_matter

     http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter

    like i already knew their is so far 7 states of matter and more can be found/discover/made/etc.

    My thought on the whole viability of plama weaponry would be that yes we can and have plasma weaponry.

    We (the human race) do have plasma weaponry but when fired upon target a second shot after would be impossible for it can not legally pass through the same space that the first shot occupied.  This has something to do with the fact that a shield like resident is left in trail and well laws of physics would have to break to allow the second shot to follow suit.

    //032// {Analyzing}

    //032// Determination= Weapon Type 2563342-118

    //032// Your weapons are inferior. My makers can destroy you with no effort.

    Ya know what? I've got a battalion stationed on Installation 03, ready to release your flood buddies and hand them a spaceship at a moments' notice, so watch your trap, got it?

    //032// This one believes he know. He cannot stop us.

    //032// You do not understand our forces. Your "Batallion" (({Estimate Strength=: 1157})) cannot withstand our weapons.

    I said FLOOD.  And *cough* activation index. 

    //032// The Installation's Theta-Class drones will destroy your forces.

    //032// The infestation will be stopped. You cannot defeat the automated systems.

     I wasn't saying I would release them.  I was asking you to stop showing off your weapons of an EXTINCT species.

    Note on the Theta class:

    Moniter 49 IPWN Has the under control.   


    Whenever a thread has been hijacked and there are big quote boxes and lots of flame, I'll be there!

    I'll be off playing ACII for a couple weeks...

  •  11-02-2009, 6:33 PM 764239 in reply to 764023

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    I may be a fairly good writer, but I'm still rather young. All this physics ad maths is lost upon me...I shall try to contribute.

    Plasma, as I remember, is the fourth state of matter. And example of plasma is lightning (I think?) Would you call lightning a gas? No, if it struck you, you would certainly know about it.

     It's perfectly possible for plasma to be harnessed by a magnetic field and directed into a path, in theory.

     ...don't believe anything I just said. It's probably all terribly wrong.

    *Goes back to creating lightbulb circuits with crocodile clips*

    :'(


    Below all available in the Library forum.

    Halo 3: Insurrection - The stunning epilogue to Halo 3.

    Memoirs of an ODST - Partake upon an epic adventure though the eyes of one who saw it all.

    Halo: True Sangheili - Scholar one day, soldier the next.
  •  11-02-2009, 6:36 PM 764242 in reply to 764233

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    //032// You threatened to start another outbreak of the Parasite. I cannot allow this to occur.

    //032// [Regret] It was my own actions which resulted in my makers' disappearance.

    //032// They are more advanced than anything in the Galaxy.

    //032// (*{REFRENCE}*)= "Moniter 49 IPWN"

    //032// Reference unknown.

  •  11-02-2009, 6:37 PM 764243 in reply to 764239

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    Wolverfrog49:

    .....

     It's perfectly possible for plasma to be harnessed by a magnetic field and directed into a path, in theory. 

    .... 

    I said that earlier, because it was clearly stated in First Strike. 

    BTW Wolver, Your FFs are so much better than Nylund's canon rape. 


    Whenever a thread has been hijacked and there are big quote boxes and lots of flame, I'll be there!

    I'll be off playing ACII for a couple weeks...

  •  11-02-2009, 6:38 PM 764245 in reply to 764242

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    Talking in command promp gives mah brain hemiroids 
    Aloysius RuLeZ!

    Being the world's best suck-up to teh most awesomest moderator ever will reward me in the future...... right???
  •  11-02-2009, 6:40 PM 764247 in reply to 764242

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    32MendicantBias:

    //032// You threatened to start another outbreak of the Parasite. I cannot allow this to occur.

    //032// [Regret] It was my own actions which resulted in my makers' disappearance.

    //032// They are more advanced than anything in the Galaxy.

    //032// (*{REFRENCE}*)= "Moniter 49 IPWN"

    //032// Reference unknown.

    You threatened to kill my species and called our weapons inferior.

     49 IPWN?....

    You don't know that little lightbulb?...

    EDIT: YOU  FUCKNIG  SPELLED REFERENCE WRONG! I WIN :D


    Whenever a thread has been hijacked and there are big quote boxes and lots of flame, I'll be there!

    I'll be off playing ACII for a couple weeks...

  •  11-02-2009, 6:43 PM 764253 in reply to 764247

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    DFang:
    32MendicantBias:

    //032// You threatened to start another outbreak of the Parasite. I cannot allow this to occur.

    //032// [Regret] It was my own actions which resulted in my makers' disappearance.

    //032// They are more advanced than anything in the Galaxy.

    //032// (*{REFRENCE}*)= "Moniter 49 IPWN"

    //032// Reference unknown.

    You threatened to kill my species and called our weapons inferior.

     

    //032// [Indignant] I stated the inadequacy of your weapons.

    //032// I made a comparison of how our weapons are superior to yours.

    //032// [[{{REF}}]]= "(032-Mendicant Bias)"

    //032// Primary Mission: Stop the Parasite. Secondary Mission: Ensure survival of those who my makers protected.

    //032// My primary mission overrides all others.

    //032// I will kill what my makers protected if they attempt to release the Parasite. 

     

  •  11-02-2009, 6:46 PM 764254 in reply to 764247

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    DFang:
    32MendicantBias:

    //032// You threatened to start another outbreak of the Parasite. I cannot allow this to occur.

    //032// [Regret] It was my own actions which resulted in my makers' disappearance.

    //032// They are more advanced than anything in the Galaxy.

    //032// (*{REFRENCE}*)= "Moniter 49 IPWN"

    //032// Reference unknown.

    You threatened to kill my species and called our weapons inferior.

     49 IPWN?....

    You don't know that little lightbulb?...

    EDIT: YOU  FUCKNIG  SPELLED REFERENCE WRONG! I WIN :D

    //032// Apologies.

    //032// **{ERROR CODE-(9956078)-}**

    //032// Translation_:"CODE:ENG-{ "TYPO" }-

    //032// The Error has been logged.

  •  11-02-2009, 6:49 PM 764258 in reply to 764253

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    32MendicantBias:
    DFang:
    32MendicantBias:

    //032// You threatened to start another outbreak of the Parasite. I cannot allow this to occur.

    //032// [Regret] It was my own actions which resulted in my makers' disappearance.

    //032// They are more advanced than anything in the Galaxy.

    //032// (*{REFRENCE}*)= "Moniter 49 IPWN"

    //032// Reference unknown.

    You threatened to kill my species and called our weapons inferior.

     

    //032// [Indignant] I stated the inadequacy of your weapons.

    //032// I made a comparison of how our weapons are superior to yours.

    //032// [[{{REF}}]]= "(032-Mendicant Bias)"

    //032// Primary Mission: Stop the Parasite. Secondary Mission: Ensure survival of those who my makers protected.

    //032// My primary mission overrides all others.

    //032// I will kill what my makers protected if they attempt to release the Parasite. 

     

    We already did it at 04...

    The covies did it at 05....

    And your primary mission was to distract the gravemind...

    I won't deny that your weapons probably are better, but it's much more fun to pump something full of lead than beam it to death. (predicted response: No one cares you barbarian!)


    Whenever a thread has been hijacked and there are big quote boxes and lots of flame, I'll be there!

    I'll be off playing ACII for a couple weeks...

  •  11-02-2009, 6:53 PM 764265 in reply to 764258

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    DFang:
    32MendicantBias:
    DFang:
    32MendicantBias:

    //032// You threatened to start another outbreak of the Parasite. I cannot allow this to occur.

    //032// [Regret] It was my own actions which resulted in my makers' disappearance.

    //032// They are more advanced than anything in the Galaxy.

    //032// (*{REFRENCE}*)= "Moniter 49 IPWN"

    //032// Reference unknown.

    You threatened to kill my species and called our weapons inferior.

     

    //032// [Indignant] I stated the inadequacy of your weapons.

    //032// I made a comparison of how our weapons are superior to yours.

    //032// [[{{REF}}]]= "(032-Mendicant Bias)"

    //032// Primary Mission: Stop the Parasite. Secondary Mission: Ensure survival of those who my makers protected.

    //032// My primary mission overrides all others.

    //032// I will kill what my makers protected if they attempt to release the Parasite. 

     

    We already did it at 04...

    The covies did it at 05....

    And your primary mission was to distract the gravemind...

    I won't deny that your weapons probably are better, but it's much more fun to pump something full of lead than beam it to death. (predicted response: No one cares you barbarian!)

    //032// My prior failures do not excuse my future duties.

    //032// You know not why I was created. I have been for longer than --"?>>/>>?$#?<%%^&^()"-- ([[{Transmission Corrupted}]])

    //032// Efficiency is superior to amusment. Primary objective for weapon systems: Defeat the enemy.

    //032// Projectile-based weapon systems are inferior.

  •  11-02-2009, 6:57 PM 764270 in reply to 764121

    Re: Plasma: A viable tech for weaponry?

    I have a simple solution that has helped man comprehend things for many years.

    It's done by........... MAGIC 


    Halo Return of the Covenant. Chapter 4 Up
    http://www.halowars.com/forums/thread/751939.aspx
    UNSC and Covenant Factions remade v2. Infantry Poll up
    http://www.halowars.com/forums/734015/ShowThread.aspx#734015
Page 3 of 5 (70 items)   < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next >
View as RSS news feed in XML