The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

Last post 09-12-2010, 9:58 AM by AC Matt Klassen. 68 replies.
Page 2 of 5 (69 items)   < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next >
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  09-08-2010, 10:45 AM 931935 in reply to 931930

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    No offence, but you and Alpha both overrate yourselves by far.

    I have no problem with you guys, you've both always been cool with me but come on, get a grip.


    hangingbaskets:

    the funny thing is that instinct is probably at least 6 inches shorter than me
  •  09-08-2010, 10:53 AM 931938 in reply to 931935

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    Instinct:

    No offence, but you and Alpha both overrate yourselves by far.

    I have no problem with you guys, you've both always been cool with me but come on, get a grip.

    I was always cool with until you said something along the lines of "I have a bad attitude" or something.

    Im going to either not rank myself or see how other players rank themselves. I mean, the criteria is hard to base off of. About the one leader pony stuff, by what do you guys mean. I can get any leader into top 100 in 1v1 except maybe arby, and in twos and threes I wouldnt say I dont know what Im doing most of the time.

     


    Forge FTW.
    3 accounts in the top 50 1v1 standard.
    Good 1v1 standard non-asian Forge player
    45 TS For 1v1

    URL of the week:
    http://wwp.greenwichmeantime.com/time-zone/usa/pacific-time/



  •  09-08-2010, 12:03 PM 931949 in reply to 931865

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    If this was 3v3 only i would have to say im at least Great, but because its not and im decent at 1s and never really played 2s. I would have to say im Good, mainly bacause i have a positive or even record agaisnt everbody except you DC in 3v3.
  •  09-08-2010, 12:11 PM 931953 in reply to 931930

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    Well..

    Winning record against every top 1v1 player except a 3-3 against strength.

    Front page 1v1 and 3v3 legit, third-ish page 2v2.

    I'd say that's pretty elite.


    justjtealouse:

    From what I understand from this forum is that "kangaroo love" is the boss around here and theres some poser named "sPro Mitch?" who keeps saying he's the best but he's not.
  •  09-08-2010, 12:11 PM 931954 in reply to 931938

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    crusaderking:
    Instinct:

    No offence, but you and Alpha both overrate yourselves by far.

    I have no problem with you guys, you've both always been cool with me but come on, get a grip.

    I was always cool with until you said something along the lines of "I have a bad attitude" or something.

    Im going to either not rank myself or see how other players rank themselves. I mean, the criteria is hard to base off of. About the one leader pony stuff, by what do you guys mean. I can get any leader into top 100 in 1v1 except maybe arby, and in twos and threes I wouldnt say I dont know what Im doing most of the time.

     

    Because you're an asshole, pure and simple.

    I'm not the only one who thinks so too.


    hangingbaskets:

    the funny thing is that instinct is probably at least 6 inches shorter than me
  •  09-08-2010, 12:12 PM 931955 in reply to 931953

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    Kangaroo Love:

    Front page 1v1 and 3v3 legit,

    Visa Blow?


    hangingbaskets:

    the funny thing is that instinct is probably at least 6 inches shorter than me
  •  09-08-2010, 12:13 PM 931957 in reply to 931954

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    Instinct:
    crusaderking:
    Instinct:

    No offence, but you and Alpha both overrate yourselves by far.

    I have no problem with you guys, you've both always been cool with me but come on, get a grip.

    I was always cool with until you said something along the lines of "I have a bad attitude" or something.

    Im going to either not rank myself or see how other players rank themselves. I mean, the criteria is hard to base off of. About the one leader pony stuff, by what do you guys mean. I can get any leader into top 100 in 1v1 except maybe arby, and in twos and threes I wouldnt say I dont know what Im doing most of the time.

     

    Because you're an asshole, pure and simple.

    I'm not the only one who thinks so too.

    I never said anything mean to you until you said about 5 things mean to me =p

    I dont care who else thinks so, I dont get mad at someone until they really are asking for it.

     


    Forge FTW.
    3 accounts in the top 50 1v1 standard.
    Good 1v1 standard non-asian Forge player
    45 TS For 1v1

    URL of the week:
    http://wwp.greenwichmeantime.com/time-zone/usa/pacific-time/



  •  09-08-2010, 12:20 PM 931958 in reply to 931957

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    Quantify your criteria maybe?

    I don't know how much weight you should include in being a one leader pony such as myself, does it make you diverse? no, but does it stop you from being high up on the leader boards? also no 

    Edit: if I base my answer off the distribution curve of the population of halo wars, being in the top 150 after taking away 2nd accounts would leave me in the great category I would think and this is applying to 1v1 only, if you take into account just forum goers and multiple gametypes then the answer would change 


    JP Bison:

    I'm not a grinder.

  •  09-08-2010, 12:22 PM 931959 in reply to 931958

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    paintballr14:

    Quantify your criteria maybe?

    I don't know how much weight you should include in being a one leader pony such as myself, does it make you diverse? no, but does it stop you from being high up on the leader boards? also no 

    Also other leaders I dont care so much about.

    I think a big big factor is how long and how many games played before you got good.


    Forge FTW.
    3 accounts in the top 50 1v1 standard.
    Good 1v1 standard non-asian Forge player
    45 TS For 1v1

    URL of the week:
    http://wwp.greenwichmeantime.com/time-zone/usa/pacific-time/



  •  09-08-2010, 12:25 PM 931960 in reply to 931955

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    Instinct:
    Kangaroo Love:

    Front page 1v1 and 3v3 legit,

    Visa Blow?

    Er, Kangaroo Love?

    If you mean 'did you boost with visa blow' then no, I've played on a team with that account but never below 37 party TS or I switch accounts, as most of you probably know.


    justjtealouse:

    From what I understand from this forum is that "kangaroo love" is the boss around here and theres some poser named "sPro Mitch?" who keeps saying he's the best but he's not.
  •  09-08-2010, 12:26 PM 931961 in reply to 931959

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    crusaderking:
    paintballr14:

    Quantify your criteria maybe?

    I don't know how much weight you should include in being a one leader pony such as myself, does it make you diverse? no, but does it stop you from being high up on the leader boards? also no 

    Also other leaders I dont care so much about.

    I think a big big factor is how long and how many games played before you got good.

    I just edited my last post but that is also an indicator, it can also be unrealistic

    I played relatively few games of 1v1 to get decent-good range but it was over a long period of time because of how busy my schedule can be, I also read the forums in the mean time and that eased my learning curves because I had less things to figure out on my own 


    JP Bison:

    I'm not a grinder.

  •  09-08-2010, 12:31 PM 931963 in reply to 931958

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    paintballr14:

    Quantify your criteria maybe?

    I don't know how much weight you should include in being a one leader pony such as myself, does it make you diverse? no, but does it stop you from being high up on the leader boards? also no 

    Edit: if I base my answer off the distribution curve of the population of halo wars, being in the top 150 after taking away 2nd accounts would leave me in the great category I would think and this is applying to 1v1 only, if you take into account just forum goers and multiple gametypes then the answer would change 

    How does playing 1 leader, in 1 gametype and still not being top 150 make you great?


    hangingbaskets:

    the funny thing is that instinct is probably at least 6 inches shorter than me
  •  09-08-2010, 12:33 PM 931964 in reply to 931957

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    crusaderking:
    Instinct:
    crusaderking:
    Instinct:

    No offence, but you and Alpha both overrate yourselves by far.

    I have no problem with you guys, you've both always been cool with me but come on, get a grip.

    I was always cool with until you said something along the lines of "I have a bad attitude" or something.

    Im going to either not rank myself or see how other players rank themselves. I mean, the criteria is hard to base off of. About the one leader pony stuff, by what do you guys mean. I can get any leader into top 100 in 1v1 except maybe arby, and in twos and threes I wouldnt say I dont know what Im doing most of the time.

     

    Because you're an asshole, pure and simple.

    I'm not the only one who thinks so too.

    I never said anything mean to you until you said about 5 things mean to me =p

    I dont care who else thinks so, I dont get mad at someone until they really are asking for it.

     

    Doesnt change the fact that ur an ***.

    http://www.halowars.com/forums/thread/931806.aspx

    Thats to some random people just looking for someone to play with and have fun.

  •  09-08-2010, 12:37 PM 931968 in reply to 931963

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    Instinct:
    paintballr14:

    Quantify your criteria maybe?

    I don't know how much weight you should include in being a one leader pony such as myself, does it make you diverse? no, but does it stop you from being high up on the leader boards? also no 

    Edit: if I base my answer off the distribution curve of the population of halo wars, being in the top 150 after taking away 2nd accounts would leave me in the great category I would think and this is applying to 1v1 only, if you take into account just forum goers and multiple gametypes then the answer would change 

    How does playing 1 leader, in 1 gametype and still not being top 150 make you great?

    top 150 if you take away second accounts, and I said the distribution of the entire halo wars population, not the forum

    if you take the average population online, not even overall all, that puts me in the top 2%, and I even gave a low average online for my timezone of 8000 people

    I also said I am appyling this only to 1v1, the list had not been quantified so it is open to interpetation 


    JP Bison:

    I'm not a grinder.

  •  09-08-2010, 12:39 PM 931969 in reply to 931964

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    IRunSC2:

    Doesnt change the fact that ur an ***.

    http://www.halowars.com/forums/thread/931806.aspx

    Thats to some random people just looking for someone to play with and have fun.

    If that's the criteria to someone being an a$$h0le then you just described 99.9999~% of people who post on these forums  :)

     


    The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about.
Page 2 of 5 (69 items)   < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next >
View as RSS news feed in XML