Navy ordnance:Let us not for get that this is the UNSC (United Nations Space Command) these are mixed units of different nations combined into a crazy military. Of course there will be a little strange referance to other military personnel, and knowing that the U.S. is currently the top military with the british not far along with the Chinese. In Halo--verse, The Navy/ Marine Corps are both the dominant force, much like said above... The Space is the navy's seas, and the planets, are the marines play ground. Army is still around because they have the best research funds to make the war better. ONI (office of naval Intelegance) may still be used often in the books but that's because they where under the Spartan project, and the best for Intellegance gathering.
I'M NOT BEING A SNARK......I'm just curious.
What do you mean when you say that the US military is currently the "top military"?
Do you mean in numbers, training, technology, experience, quality, advertising(recruiting efforts), funding, or, maybe, in news coverage("media exposure")?
According to pretty much everybody in NATO, and the UN, including the UN Security Council, the top 3 for training, experience, and quality of individual soldiers are, in no particular order, Britain, Canada, and the Israelis; with the US being somewhere in the top 10, either 7th or 8th, but I can't remember which.
China only has numbers; at present, they have the LARGEST standing army on the planet; so why would you say they come just after the Brits?
The US only hits the top spot in terms of: technology, which is usually considered as much of a disadvantage as an advantage (1 EMP and you've got major problems); advertising(recruiting efforts); funding; and "media exposure", which is seen as a major disadvantage in terms of operational security.
In case you're wondering, if EVERY other standing army, on the planet, were to face off against the Chinese army, we'd probably need some reinforcements, the Chinese have that many soldiers.
I'm not trying to be argumentative with this post, I'm just curious as to what you based your observations on.
Later.