Explain how a spartan could defeat just one jedi that uses supernatural powers and can block all incoming bullets with the lightsaber.

I dont know much about starwars but i played battlefront 2 and saw the movies... it seemed like the only ways they died were when they were outnumbered or a stronger jedi...

Remember how it took 2 beams from the scarab to destroy the door at the end of halo2? It doesnt own absolutely everything. Remember how all you do is shoot the legs with small explosives in halo3 and it is sent to the ground and eventually blows up when you go inside, etc.?

I think an AT-AT would destroy a scarab.

don't get me wrong i like star wars as much as the next guy, but in this case i would have to go with the scarab...

---

Gone and forgotten...

laxspartan007:

scarab has more agiliity,semi-auto HUGE *** lazer,secondary auto gun,so i think scarab would win even if the at-at has a more powerful gun...1 shot at the at-at's leg and it will go down...but MABY the at-at could win...maby

that and the range

---

actually the AT-AT has more guns than the scarab

true, but a continuous beam of plasma is by far more powerful

---

Gone and forgotten...

To hammer: read my first post.

glarrg:

...do i HAVE to explain the power source for Star Wars lasers? Fine! ok! (please correct me if im wrong)

 Star Wars lasers use spin sealed tibbana(sp) gas whice is super compressed and heated to well above plasma levels. it is then focused down a lense which intensifies it tenfold. Thats just the standard lasers as well(which the AT-AT has 2 of [ left hand side of head]). The AT-ATs main weapon is twin light turbolasers which uses fusion and the same above method to produce tremendous power. Its final weapon is a (i think) grenade launcher on the right hand side of its head.

 The AT-AT also has (looks at book) two feet of Durasteel armour plating and can hold (looks again) ether 12 speeder bikes, 25 troops or 2 AT-ST's. In addition the AT-AT is 22 meters high.

 so i think i would choose the AT-AT

are you forgetting what plasma does in the books?

plasma burns a hole straight through a UNSC cruiser or whatever it was

now if you're telling me that somehow the empire, with armor most likely of less quantity then a spaceship, found a way to withstand

 a beam of plasma, i'm all ears...

 

 

---

Gone and forgotten...

My talking was more geared towards comparison of all the weapons on both vehicles (note grunts and brutes with fuel rod guns do not count or i'll have to count in how much support the AT-AT can use(which im not so far))

glarrg:

minime151245:

yea but the scarab has many support units such as fuel rod grunts and bording elites

on BattleFront 2 about 2 cannons could distory the AT AT the scarab took on a whole army of unsc marines on old mossmbsa,and i may remind you guys that the only reason they won was because they trapped it and A SPARTAN who of witch could kill 5 jedis because a few clones could kill them borded it and destoryed it and the halo 3 one would be sorta harder because it could self repair and it has more turrets and brutes with brute shots and other things.it'd be like this if it was a brute vs some clones.

Brute would = wookie

wookie is rly strong cause if you play republic commando then you saw that one dude kill aton of tranasotions that'd basicly be the brute cheiftan

so wookie cheiftan vs a few bording clones....we all know who would win

so the scarab vs the at at still = scarab wins

 

ps-i will destory you all to find a pie! 

 

oh my god... Taking facts from Battlefront two...THE END IS NIGH!

 dont talk about things you dont understand.

 Spartans in no way shape or form = Jedi. end of discussion.

 Clones have better weaponry than the covenant, better ships and better vehicles.

spartans traven in groups of 5 or more,jedi 1 or 2...1v5 spartans will win...2v5 semi equil

---

we will always remember...
Linda-058,dud_doodoo,
ES,Thunder,Fenix

Ryzza,sparhawk,bacon,vigil,Rotaretilbo
mr.grenade,ARTEMIS,Arbiter,robborboy
BBJynne,grey101,AI,AWSOME,Felix
Oynx,rasq',oOffensive bias,NT,TN
Legandary Halo,Boot,Aukele,Paragon

Hammerboy217: Underboss:

true, but a continuous beam of plasma is by far more powerful

It depends. Halo 2 scarab would stand a better chance because of it's superior armor and plasma beam. Whereas the Halo3 Scarab beats the H2 version hands down in mobility.

The AT-AT has very resiliant armor and is nigh impossible to bring down by conventional means. Mean while the H3 Scarab is exceedingly vulnerable to fire from infantry held anti-armor weapons. The Halo 3 Scarab's main gun can barely kill an obsolete scorpion tank in one blast and sometimes it doesn't. An AT-AT is much more heavily armed and armored than a Scorpion tank, plus it's main guns have pretty impressive range and power, taking out a massive power generator.

---

Ride the Rocket

To laxspartan: Are we talking about the same type of jedi here? Im talking about ones that can move stuff just by slightly concentrating and anticipate moves before you've done them. One jedi could easily kill ten spartans.

ok granted: The AT-AT does have a lot of fire power to spare, and i'm not saying that it doesn't

i actualy think it could destroy a couple Wraiths even after taking a few hits

 but what i am trying to say its:

 that with a top speed of 60 kph (overfault terrain) it is slower that the scarab

Considering that it is almost immune to laser fire (except for in the neck reigon [soft spot]

i would estimate that if a wraith lobbed a few rounds at it, the armor would resist for quite a few rounds, but eventually desintigrate

hang on...

 

 

---

Gone and forgotten...

glarrg:

To laxspartan:  One jedi could easily kill ten spartans.

now there's something we agree on...

 

---

Gone and forgotten...

Offensive Bias:

Hammerboy217: Underboss:

true, but a continuous beam of plasma is by far more powerful

It depends. Halo 2 scarab would stand a better chance because of it's superior armor and plasma beam. Whereas the Halo3 Scarab beats the H2 version hands down in mobility.

The AT-AT has very resiliant armor and is nigh impossible to bring down by conventional means. Mean while the H3 Scarab is exceedingly vulnerable to fire from infantry held anti-armor weapons. The Halo 3 Scarab's main gun can barely kill an obsolete scorpion tank in one blast and sometimes it doesn't. An AT-AT is much more heavily armed and armored than a Scorpion tank, plus it's main guns have pretty impressive range and power, taking out a massive power generator.

well asuming that we're referring to the Halo 2 scarab, this is the easiest level i can bring my point to:

Scarab - Firepower, less so armor (not saying that it has none)

AT-AT - Armor, less so firepower (not saying that it has none)

 

the two are the perfect counter measures for each other...

 

but if we're talkingh about the halo 3 scarab, then yeah the AT-AT would probably win...

---

Gone and forgotten...

yes thats one thing i'll give to the scarab, its much faster and much more manuverable.

 

oh and about the jedi, im pretty sure the jedi could have the spartans killing each other after a while of mind tricks