The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

Last post 09-12-2010, 9:58 AM by AC Matt Klassen. 68 replies.
Page 1 of 5 (69 items)   1 2 3 4 5 Next >
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  09-08-2010, 12:24 AM 931865

    The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    Recently, Alpha made the truest post I've ever seen:

    Comrade Stalin:this is what I've been trying to get into people's heads.  1 win doesn't matter, its your overall record against the top people. Anyone can get 1 win and just be like, " well, since I beat this guy I'm automatically better than him"  look at sc2 for example, all the top people lose a lot of games but win most of them.

    To expand on that, I'm curious to see how people REALISTICALLY rate themselves. In my experience, many below average high-level players rate themselves way too high based on meaningless records, whereas I rate myself and others based on actual indications of skill.

    Please rate yourself. Be realistic.

     

    Elite

    -DC Sparta

     

     

    Great

     

     

    Good

     

     

    Decent

     

     

    Mediocre

     

     

    Below Mediocre

     

     

    Bad 

     

     



    Top 10,000 in 2v2 Tug of War Party Teams
    Mediocre 1v1 Arbiter, and that's being generous
    11 TS for 1v1 Reinforcements
    Entire Halo Wars Community:
    Sparta>MitchBama in every gamemode with every leader
  •  09-08-2010, 12:30 AM 931866 in reply to 931865

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    Between mediocre and decent (in 1's)

     


    GT ~ King Leonighdus
    1v1 TS - 41
    PoR
  •  09-08-2010, 12:45 AM 931867 in reply to 931865

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    Same ranking criteria as the other one, teams and ones, leader variety, etc. I wouldn't hesitate in saying that at least 80% of players overrate themselves ;)

    Maybe even me. Who knows. 



    Top 10,000 in 2v2 Tug of War Party Teams
    Mediocre 1v1 Arbiter, and that's being generous
    11 TS for 1v1 Reinforcements
    Entire Halo Wars Community:
    Sparta>MitchBama in every gamemode with every leader
  •  09-08-2010, 12:52 AM 931868 in reply to 931865

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    Bad -

    sPro Slayer

    Mediocre would be being generous.


    I'm Terri-Trash at best :(
  •  09-08-2010, 1:40 AM 931881 in reply to 931868

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    every member of the average joes falls between decent to below mediocre, if I must play to this game Sparta has made.
    http://www.averagejoesgames.com/
    go here
  •  09-08-2010, 1:48 AM 931883 in reply to 931881

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    i suck put in xtra beyond bad lol
    Pm me If You Want Reinforcement Tips.
    1v1 43 Ts
    2v2 37 Ts
    iEnsemble&CrusaderKing #1 Reinforcements Team
  •  09-08-2010, 2:12 AM 931886 in reply to 931865

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    I'm not really sure, mayby great or good. i know just about every single strat in 3v3, 2v2 and 1v1, including your strat that only u, alpha and klunk know on fort deen and I can execute them perfectly everytime, and I can use every leader in every playlist. I'm good at 1's but not the best and I'm great at 2's. what do you think DC? btw I'm not sure if it is the strat that you guys use for fort deen, if it isn't then I'll use it. 
    Halo Wars Top Australian, GT:Afterburnn000, ANDERSFORGECUTE, AnderLuvForge,
  •  09-08-2010, 2:22 AM 931887 in reply to 931886

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    elite, I can use every leader well enough in 2s to beat pretty much everyone, same in 3s apart from maybe anders, and anders well enough to be around the top 10 players in 1v1 if the leaderboards reset

    mediocre at best- spro slayer, and thats being veeery generous. 

    all the way down there- Ethics 

    (I hope I fooled everyone with my high self-rating cause realistically I cant break TS 2)

    there should be an asterisk for every team gametype DC has high TS in cause he couldn't have gotten it if it wasnt for me, and I guess that applies to 1v1 as well.

     


    Best US HW player named Anatoliy

    dont expect much when u play me, Im really not very good just really lucky

    Playing mostly sc2 and occasionally HW when sc2 gets too hard
  •  09-08-2010, 2:40 AM 931891 in reply to 931887

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    please alpha u just mad.... Ethics for #1...

    But seriously,  the reason I stopped taking this game competitively was due the constant belittling I got from my own team mates (domination/ team rocket) and any little mistake I made after not playing for a while people would ride me about it for weeks/ months... but when someone else does the same mistake (or worse) because of their status it just blew over and they are not looked down on.

    This took the fun out of the game and I stopped playing less.

    I honestly believe that in the last few months I became and under rated player. There are no strats or thinking situations I can't handle 99% of the time. If I kept playing I would easily be elite. But due to not playing for months and seriously for a year I'd be -1 tier due to rust.

    On a side note - I never liked using people's strats, regardless teams or 1v1's I liked having my own strats and thinking outside the box.... most of 1v1 top players just take parts of eachothers strats and you get like 14-18 yr olds  that join ever party "HEY xxxxxx WHAT WOULD I DO IN THIS SITUATION!?!?" that's not being good at the game. You people who are 'good' now just re-use top player strats from years ago - to me this got boring


    Sl Loboz:
    then ethics came, and all was good in the world
  •  09-08-2010, 6:20 AM 931915 in reply to 931891

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    make a section called i dont even play the game anymore but you guys are so funny sometimes i cant leave the website

    eastred dragon:
    I can guarentee I have had a longer girlfriend than all of Instinct's relationships


    A longer girlfriend?

    No Eastred, the male is supposed to have the penis.


  •  09-08-2010, 7:52 AM 931918 in reply to 931886

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    Afterburnn000:I'm not really sure, mayby great or good. i know just about every single strat in 3v3, 2v2 and 1v1, including your strat that only u, alpha and klunk know on fort deen and I can execute them perfectly everytime, and I can use every leader in every playlist. I'm good at 1's but not the best and I'm great at 2's. what do you think DC? btw I'm not sure if it is the strat that you guys use for fort deen, if it isn't then I'll use it. 
    You dont know it. But you're close enough.
    High level 3v3 translation= Copy stuff I did a year ago (poorly)
  •  09-08-2010, 8:21 AM 931921 in reply to 931918

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    kiunk:
    Afterburnn000:I'm not really sure, mayby great or good. i know just about every single strat in 3v3, 2v2 and 1v1, including your strat that only u, alpha and klunk know on fort deen and I can execute them perfectly everytime, and I can use every leader in every playlist. I'm good at 1's but not the best and I'm great at 2's. what do you think DC? btw I'm not sure if it is the strat that you guys use for fort deen, if it isn't then I'll use it. 
    You dont know it. But you're close enough.

    What do you mean by that?


    Halo Wars Top Australian, GT:Afterburnn000, ANDERSFORGECUTE, AnderLuvForge,
  •  09-08-2010, 8:37 AM 931922 in reply to 931865

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    Voodoo Wards:

    Recently, Alpha made the truest post I've ever seen:

    Comrade Stalin:this is what I've been trying to get into people's heads.  1 win doesn't matter, its your overall record against the top people. Anyone can get 1 win and just be like, " well, since I beat this guy I'm automatically better than him"  look at sc2 for example, all the top people lose a lot of games but win most of them.

    To expand on that, I'm curious to see how people REALISTICALLY rate themselves. In my experience, many below average high-level players rate themselves way too high based on meaningless records, whereas I rate myself and others based on actual indications of skill.

    Please rate yourself. Be realistic.

     

    Elite

     

     

     

    Great

     

     

    Good

     

     

    Decent

    -DC Sparta

     

    Mediocre

     

     

    Below Mediocre

     

     

    Bad 

     xXlxMiKeYxlXx

     

    Below Bad

    slayer

     


    Reinforcements: http://www.halowars.com/forums/thread/803859.aspx
  •  09-08-2010, 10:07 AM 931928 in reply to 931922

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    Mikey the Brute:
    Voodoo Wards:

    Recently, Alpha made the truest post I've ever seen:

    Comrade Stalin:this is what I've been trying to get into people's heads.  1 win doesn't matter, its your overall record against the top people. Anyone can get 1 win and just be like, " well, since I beat this guy I'm automatically better than him"  look at sc2 for example, all the top people lose a lot of games but win most of them.

    To expand on that, I'm curious to see how people REALISTICALLY rate themselves. In my experience, many below average high-level players rate themselves way too high based on meaningless records, whereas I rate myself and others based on actual indications of skill.

    Please rate yourself. Be realistic.

     

    Elite

     

     

     

    Great

     

     

    Good

     

     

    Decent

    -DC Sparta

     

    Mediocre

     

     

    Below Mediocre

     

     

    Bad 

     xXlxMiKeYxlXx, Tohie

     

    Below Bad

    slayer

     


    Mae'n gas gyda fi plant dwrg yn enwedig pan fyddant yn ar fy nhim -_-
  •  09-08-2010, 10:16 AM 931930 in reply to 931928

    Re: The Self-Ranking Experimental Player List!

    Apparently in the other list I was placed in decent because I'm a 1 leader pony and I only play 2s even though I can do just as well in 3s (virtually the same strats with an extra arbiter). Not that it matters but I see myself fitting better in the "good" category. Whatever though, not a big deal. Don't even play the game anymore lol.
    GT: TockSikk
    Starcraft 2
    Recreant
    427.
    Instinct:

    I will catch a plane to America just to kiss Toxic on the face.

    He has a brilliant taste in music.


Page 1 of 5 (69 items)   1 2 3 4 5 Next >
View as RSS news feed in XML